The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1673 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 November 2023
Russell Findlay
The Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service expects that the most recent ruling on corroboration not being required in some rape cases will result in a significant number of new prosecutions. Has the Scottish Government analysed that in any way, and has it discussed with the SCTS that new workload and its cost?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 November 2023
Russell Findlay
That seems slightly at odds with the information that we have in the documents, which says that fiscal fines are now being applied to a wider range of offences, but I will move on, because it is clear that people are not being told what offences they will be applied to.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 November 2023
Russell Findlay
Perhaps. In response to the point that the cabinet secretary made about people’s ideological opposition, I do not think that crime victims are ideologically opposed to such fines. They want to see justice being done and they want transparency. One of the concerns that many of them express is that, with these direct measures, little or no explanation is given to them as victims. You also make the point that the Crown Office rightly deals with prosecutorial matters, but here we are as parliamentarians discussing what those should be. It is not a question of it being entirely up to the Crown Office.
Going back to the point about the extension of the use of fiscal fines and their increase in value from £300 to £500, is there not an argument to be made that, if the Government wants this to be part of the legislative framework for the criminal justice system, it should be brought forward as stand-alone legislation rather than brought in by stealth using the Covid pandemic legislation?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 November 2023
Russell Findlay
I understand. Can I interject? I am sorry to interrupt but we have very little time. The staff indeed have concerns. For example, they will lose their body-worn cameras and they will go from an electronic human resources system for holidays and so on to the paper-based system that is used by the SPS, which seems regressive to me and to them. However, what I am surprised at, and they are surprised at, is that the SPS is sitting in front of us today unable to say how much the transfer will cost or how much the running costs will be. Can you explain that?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 November 2023
Russell Findlay
Absolutely. That question was about the budget for HMP Kilmarnock but my next question is specifically about the budget for HMP Glasgow and the impact that that will have on the SPS. The SPS capital budget for 2024-25 was £192 million; for 2025-26 it will be £80 million; and—I have not done this in chronological order—for 2023-24 it is £97 million. The total for those three years is less than the projected or speculated cost of £400 million for the new HMP Glasgow. First, is £400 million the most up-to-date figure and how on earth can you expect to pay for it, given these sums?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 November 2023
Russell Findlay
Given the very real concerns around costs and the fact that we do not know how much the new prison will cost, are you having conversations with the Government about additional capital funding to meet the cost of HMP Glasgow?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 November 2023
Russell Findlay
David Kennedy of the Scottish Police Federation has described policing in Scotland as having been “asset stripped” over the past decade, with more than 140 police stations being closed and a reduction in the number of officers. We have heard similar concerns in the past from the previous chief constable and others in policing. What does the Government intend to do to deal with the capital backlog in policing?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 November 2023
Russell Findlay
We can debate police officer numbers all day long and interpret statistics in our own way, but one thing that we can agree on is that, uniquely in the United Kingdom, Police Scotland officers do not have the protection of body-worn cameras. Provision of those was a commitment made by the First Minister on at least two occasions, but the most recent response with regard to the budget for Police Scotland is that it may not have the money to bring them in to give officers protection. Are you concerned about that specific area, and is there anything that can be done to assure officers that they will get those cameras?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 November 2023
Russell Findlay
Okay. Thank you very much.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 November 2023
Russell Findlay
The SPS witnesses were also unable to tell us how much it would cost to transfer HMP Kilmarnock or the likely cost of running that prison. Has the Scottish Government done any financial analysis of that? Can that be shared with the committee?