The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1673 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 6 December 2023
Russell Findlay
Mr Duffy, I pay tribute to everything that you and your family have done during 31 long years of campaigning. You have spoken to probably every journalist in Scotland—and, no doubt, to every committee. After all that time, it seems that the scrapping of the not proven verdict is within touching distance. In all the years of hostility that you faced from the legal profession and others, did you think that this day would ever come? Perhaps another way of looking at it is, did you think that it would take so long?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 6 December 2023
Russell Findlay
Over the 31 years that you have been campaigning, how many other families have you assisted?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 6 December 2023
Russell Findlay
Your organisation will have pointed that out for a long time, I guess.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 6 December 2023
Russell Findlay
Indeed.
The not proven verdict is an international anomaly. I get the sense that the legal profession has almost given up the fight on it. However, it is very concerned about the proposal to not just reduce the jury size but change the required numbers for a guilty verdict to eight out of 12—which, in itself, would be another international anomaly. I will quote to you what the Faculty of Advocates has told us:
“The inevitable consequence of Scotland adopting a majority of eight from twelve would be an international communication that Scotland places less value on protecting its citizens accused of crime than any and every other nation with a jury system.”
Do you share those concerns in any way?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 6 December 2023
Russell Findlay
Am I right in saying that most of those whom you have helped, who were in a similar position to you, would have had no real knowledge of the verdict, or even of its existence, until then?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 6 December 2023
Russell Findlay
Jurors might fall into line. However, we just do not know.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 6 December 2023
Russell Findlay
Thank you very much for that.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 6 December 2023
Russell Findlay
However, in many other comparable jurisdictions, there is a requirement for unanimity, or one short of unanimity, which seems to work. Might that be the way forward?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 6 December 2023
Russell Findlay
Good morning. I start by picking up on Sandy Brindley’s earlier point about data. I would like to know how many rapes are reported to police and how many are prosecuted; how many of those involved a single complainer or multiple complainers; and, subsequently, how many resulted in a guilty, not guilty or not proven verdict. If I have understood you correctly, we, and you, do not have that data.
10:30Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 November 2023
Russell Findlay
What about the issue of the seriousness of the crime requiring unanimity in certain cases?