The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1673 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2024
Russell Findlay
Yes.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2024
Russell Findlay
The proposed judge-only rape trials are, arguably, the most contentious part of the bill. The SCTS supports those. It supports the creation of a sexual offences court, the anonymity of victims, legal representation for victims and, indeed, judge-only rape trials. Given your role as almost a neutral party in many respects and given the opposition to judge-only rape trials in particular, has any consideration been given to the courts service being seen to be less supportive of a Government or establishment view on the need for all those radical measures?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2024
Russell Findlay
Lady Dorrian’s review recommended the creation of a specialist sexual offences court, and the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service is supportive of that. I will pick up on some of the questions that Pauline McNeill put earlier. Your submission says that the inclusion of other crimes up to and including murder could add to much higher costs being borne by the court service. Given the unpredictability—we heard from Lady Dorrian today that she still believes that the crime of murder should not be tried in the new court—what is your position on that? Do you have any more information on what the costs might look like in that scenario?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2024
Russell Findlay
It is incredible to think that it was 1996—two years after you became a QC—that the first female Scottish judge was appointed, which is, of course, less than 30 years ago. It has perhaps taken women being in those positions to drive a lot of the change.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2024
Russell Findlay
The bill proposes anonymity for victims. The Crown Office’s submission to the committee makes what appears to be an important point about a potential oversight relating to the proposed anonymity measure. As drafted, it seems that anonymity might not apply in cases where the outcome is acquittal. That might result in victims being deterred from reporting crime, which is completely at odds with the intent of the bill and trauma-informed practice.
Since you made the submission to the committee, has the Scottish Government had any communication with the Crown about that?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2024
Russell Findlay
So, in all likelihood, there will be an amendment from the Government.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2024
Russell Findlay
Hence the need for the written reasons.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2024
Russell Findlay
That makes sense. Thank you.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2024
Russell Findlay
In which case, if there is the ability to impose the trauma-informed best practice of the sexual offences court on a High Court murder trial, does that not make you ask why we would bother with the great cost and effort of creating sexual offences courts in the first place?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2024
Russell Findlay
I raise that case because the Lord Advocate did so, and it seems pertinent to the potential fault line here. Is it your view that, even though murder is the primary charge, a case such as the one described would find itself in the sexual offences court?