The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1673 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 17 January 2024
Russell Findlay
Can I ask a very quick question about judges, convener?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 17 January 2024
Russell Findlay
First, I thank you all for all the work that you have been doing, and for waiving your anonymity, which cannot have been easy.
The evidence that we have heard so far has been really compelling, and so many things that you have said jump out: being treated as an outsider in the court; being treated as a bit of evidence; and being alone and scared. I note what Ellie said about how the defence lawyers often conduct themselves and how the court is an environment in which individuals can act with impunity.
I have a lot of questions. One issue that we have not touched on so far relates to the proposed new sexual offences courts and the proposal that there should be a pilot of judge-only rape trials without juries.
Do you have any views on whether, in your circumstances, you would have preferred a non-jury trial, or were you satisfied with that aspect? Was the presence of a jury almost a counter to the legal establishment that dictated the rest of the proceedings?
Any one of you can answer.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 17 January 2024
Russell Findlay
Thank you. I am mindful that other members want to come in.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 17 January 2024
Russell Findlay
I asked the previous panel whether they had views on having the option of a non-jury trial. Would that have made any difference to any of you?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2024
Russell Findlay
Under the new policy, if someone like Isla Bryson or—if you do not want to talk about individuals—any male-bodied sex criminal sought a transfer to the women’s estate, it could happen.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2024
Russell Findlay
I do not think that anyone has a problem with respecting individuals’ names and so on. This is about what is required of prisoners and staff being at odds with what prominent politicians have stated. Do you see that anomaly?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2024
Russell Findlay
—I am not getting a clear answer.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2024
Russell Findlay
Absolutely.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2024
Russell Findlay
I do not doubt that.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2024
Russell Findlay
I am sure that I speak for many MSPs and members of the public when I say that today’s session was pretty frustrating and fell short of really meaningful scrutiny. That is no criticism of the convener or the clerks, given the time that we had available, but, ultimately, the SPS policy puts the rights of male prisoners who identify as women above the rights of voiceless and vulnerable female inmates. It allows for an acceptable risk of harm to women, and it is a retread of the previous flawed policy.
If I understand it correctly, SSI 2023/364 allows staff to disclose information about prisoners’ trans status in the execution of their duty, which seems to be entirely proper.
On SSI 2023/366, although the default rule is that a trans-identifying male prisoner would be expected to be searched, or could be searched, by a female prison officer, the SSI allows for a prisoner of that definition to seek to be searched by someone of their birth sex. That is not in itself controversial. However, what is much more concerning in relation to the searching issue is that, despite repeated attempts, I was unable to elicit from the Scottish Prison Service today an answer as to whether prison officers in the female estate will have an opt-out when it comes to searching people who are male-bodied.
Obviously, we do not have a vote on the policy in its entirety: if we did, I would vote against it for all the reasons that we have touched on and many more that we have not had time to touch on. However, I do not intend to move the motions to annul the two SSIs.