The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1673 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 17 January 2024
Russell Findlay
You would rather that there was a binary choice without the not proven verdict.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 17 January 2024
Russell Findlay
I commend you all for waiving your anonymity, campaigning and coming here. Your testimony is so powerful and so helpful to our knowledge of what is really happening in the courts. There is a lot of ground to cover, but I start with a question that relates to your experience, Sarah. You have perhaps been an exception to the rule in that trauma-informed practice can happen and people can be treated properly with dignity and respect. Do any of you have views on whether legislation is required to achieve that, given all the various parties that are involved in the process?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 17 January 2024
Russell Findlay
I do not think that I have taken so many notes in any of these evidence sessions as I have done today and, given the finite time that we have, I am slightly overwhelmed in deciding which questions to go with, but I will focus on parts 5 and 6 of the bill.
My first question, on part 5, goes back to something that Sharon Dowey touched on earlier: the practicalities of what the proposed specialist sexual offences courts might look like. We have heard new evidence about the right for complainers to watch proceedings from a safe space of some sort. That sounds like a great idea but, given that that would be in the same building as the courtroom, there will not be anything bespoke brought into play, partly due to financial reasons. How might it be achieved?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 17 January 2024
Russell Findlay
Such as the Victim Support Scotland facilities that already exist.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 17 January 2024
Russell Findlay
The other issue that I wish to discuss is to the use of pre-recorded evidence. That does happen now, but the new legislation will make it the default. Some new research by Professor Cheryl Thomas KC at University College London, which came out a few days ago, found that, across all crimes, the rate of conviction is 10 per cent lower when pre-recorded evidence is used. In respect of rape crimes, it is 20 per cent lower. That is not absolute, and it may not wholly apply, but I wonder whether that research, which I am sure that you are aware of, has surprised you in any way. Has it given you any cause to rethink the whole-hearted support for those arrangements in the bill? If not, what might be done to mitigate or fix that anticipated decrease in conviction rates? That might be one for Sandy Brindley to address.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 17 January 2024
Russell Findlay
Presumably, the Crown and the courts have information about conviction rates where that approach has been used, both for crimes of a sexual nature and for crimes of a non-sexual nature. That is something that we should consider.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 17 January 2024
Russell Findlay
With regard to single-judge and non-jury rape trials, I note that Rape Crisis Scotland’s submission talks about the conduct of “unsympathetic and unreceptive judges” towards rape victims and suggests that, even with training, they might hold biased views. In fact, a judge in a recent case misdirected a jury, resulting in a child rapist walking free and adding to the victim’s trauma—and that happened in much more enlightened times. I wonder whether the bill goes far enough in respect of the requirements on the judiciary to ensure that, especially with judge-only trials, judges get sufficient training.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 17 January 2024
Russell Findlay
Do you favour a different approach?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 17 January 2024
Russell Findlay
I assume that you would rather get rid of the not proven verdict, on that basis.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 17 January 2024
Russell Findlay
Often, the Crown does not object to such applications, so the victim is left with no voice.
I think that you also support an extension of the proposed timescale in the bill, from 21 to 28 days.