The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1673 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Russell Findlay
In addition, it was only in autumn last year that the new rules were brought in under which judges instruct jurors about rape myths, so we do not yet know what effect that has had.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Russell Findlay
It was about how the lack of similar research data in Scotland makes it very difficult for us to assess the proposals.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 17 January 2024
Russell Findlay
I wonder whether that goes back to some of the evidence that you gave us previously about data.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 17 January 2024
Russell Findlay
I have a question on part 6, if I have time, convener. [Interruption.] I will take that as a yes.
My question is about the invocation of section 275 in the 1995 act, and the requirement for independent legal representation in that situation, which is in the bill. Serious concerns have been raised by the Crown, the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service, the judges and the Law Society of Scotland about that provision leading to additional churn and delay and further trauma for complainers. However, a new element has been raised today by some of the witnesses we heard from earlier, which is about cases in which character or sexual history information is introduced in effect by stealth by defence lawyers without making a section 275 application. How widespread might that be? Does the bill need to address that particular blind spot or loophole, or whatever you want to call it?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 17 January 2024
Russell Findlay
Thank you very much.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 17 January 2024
Russell Findlay
That also applies to the section 275 process. The legislation seeks to ensure that a victim complainer would be able to get legal representation in the event of a section 275 application. In your case, however, the evidence was effectively introduced without the defence having sought that. I wonder whether that would leave you and others exposed, without representation. What do you think could be done about that?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 17 January 2024
Russell Findlay
Is that a shared view?
09:45Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 17 January 2024
Russell Findlay
I presume that, if you had had some form of legal representation, you would have been able to respond to that.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 17 January 2024
Russell Findlay
Following on from that point, I would say that many things could be done without legislation. One of the central parts of the proposed legislation is to embed trauma-informed practice. I am not entirely sure exactly what that means. If it means treating people with dignity and respect, do we really need legislation to achieve that?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 17 January 2024
Russell Findlay
That goes back to Hannah Stakes’s point and her experience. A prosecutor and a defence lawyer were best of pals and very clubbable. In that scenario, in all likelihood, the judge may well have personal connections, too, and a similar background.