The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1673 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2024
Russell Findlay
The bill creates a criminal offence for those who breach the new measure on anonymity. It struck me that one of the defences seems broad: that a person did not know that they were breaking the law. I do not think that that applies in many circumstances. Are you satisfied with that defence?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2024
Russell Findlay
Victim Support Scotland seeks to have the right of anonymity given to child homicide victims, which is similar territory. Do you have any views on that? Have you looked at that?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2024
Russell Findlay
I have a quick point for clarification. As the bill is drafted, someone under 18 could put their own experience on social media—they have that autonomy—and it could get 10 million or 20 million views. It could go viral, but if the BBC wanted to report it, it would have to go to court and get a sheriff to say that that was okay.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2024
Russell Findlay
Incuriosity is almost a defence.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2024
Russell Findlay
In its warning, the College of Justice specifies section 29(2) of the Scotland Act 1998. Does that relate to trial by jury?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Russell Findlay
Have any of you picked up any sense from the Scottish Government that, in the face of all the opposition that there has been, there might be some movement on that?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Russell Findlay
Professor Thomas, do you want to come in on my original question? I went off at a slight tangent.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Russell Findlay
Your research also analysed and assessed every rape case in England and Wales between 2007 and 2021, which was thousands of cases. No such research has taken place in Scotland.
You have proposed two possible reasons for the apparent difference in outcomes in the two different jurisdictions, one being that Scottish jurors may be more biased, the other being that it is due to differences in the legal systems. However, because of the lack of similar research in Scotland, we cannot properly get to the bottom of that.
My question is for all the witnesses. Does the lack of research into the Scottish system make it difficult for the committee to assess whether the measures in the bill are required? Anyone can answer that.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Russell Findlay
I have a quick question about research. Professor Thomas has helpfully torpedoed another myth, which is that you cannot speak to real jurors. Are there any moves for that to happen in Scotland?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Russell Findlay
You have helpfully answered one of my other questions, so I will come in with one more quick question.
In England and Wales, judges have been able to direct juries about rape myths since 2006; that is effectively compulsory. However, it is only since autumn 2023 that that has begun to happen as a matter of routine in Scottish courts. The legal fraternity says that the practice needs to be allowed to bed in and that an assessment of its impact needs to take place—I think that you essentially agree with that.
Can you give us your thoughts on that?