The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1673 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2024
Russell Findlay
In what practical way does the framework differ from what the proposed legislation will achieve?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2024
Russell Findlay
I have a general question, if that is okay.
We have a submission from the senators of the College of Justice, some of whom support the proposed pilot scheme for juryless rape trials and some of whom are opposed to it. Those who are opposed say that it may not comply with article 6 of the European convention on human rights and may not be within the legislative competence of the Scottish Parliament. They cite what the Scotland Act 1998, which you referred to in your initial answer, says about the independence of the Lord Advocate. Has the Crown Office assessed that warning about potential legislative incompetence? If so, how real is that threat, what, if anything, is being done to address it and how seriously should the committee take it?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2024
Russell Findlay
Are you satisfied that that is not the case?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2024
Russell Findlay
Name names.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2024
Russell Findlay
If I extend that point, defamation laws also protect individuals who may be accused of something.
I find the research to be fascinating. As a former journalist, I was guilty of the presumption that you describe—I hold up my hands. The media did and do take the issue very seriously—in fact, the legal advisers to the media effectively give the impression that, even if the words “legal right to anonymity” are wrong, the right to anonymity exists almost by convention. However, I see the need, since the advent of social media, to legislate for that. I see no argument against it.
Given that you are quite satisfied with the bill as drafted, did you have any input into the drafting of or advising in relation to that respect?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2024
Russell Findlay
That might be why Rape Crisis Scotland is of the view that anonymity should not continue after death.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2024
Russell Findlay
And a sheriff could say no.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2024
Russell Findlay
The measure is a significant change to the system. There are potential repercussions, as we have seen in other parts of the world. We have seen what can happen if such a measure goes too far, and that there can be a backlash in that respect. The bill seeks to avoid that.
Given that complainer anonymity is now part of a bill that includes many other huge and contentious changes—for example, the removal of the not proven verdict, the juryless rape trial pilot, and changes to the size and majority of a jury—and that those are getting all the attention, would it have benefited from being a separate piece of legislation?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2024
Russell Findlay
That is the point: complainer anonymity is not getting the attention that it should. It is when we start thinking and talking about it that a lot of stuff comes to the fore, and the committee has, understandably, spent much of its time talking about the other issues that I mentioned.
Andrew Tickell, do you think that complainer anonymity might have benefited from stand-alone scrutiny?
12:00Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2024
Russell Findlay
You now accept the provisions. What was the nature of the conversation with the Scottish Government? Was the concern premature, or was more explanation provided by the Scottish Government?
09:15