The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1673 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2024
Russell Findlay
Okay—thank you. I will not take up any more time.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2024
Russell Findlay
Do you have any proposals for how that particular problem might be addressed?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2024
Russell Findlay
I think that the Crown Office suggested that the timescale should be increased. The bill as drafted allows X days for the process to be completed.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2024
Russell Findlay
So, the situation is that, in all likelihood, even if nobody formally calls it a boycott, that might be what comes about.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2024
Russell Findlay
I will move on to the purpose of the pilot. It is not clear how the scheme will be assessed as a success or a failure. The Scottish Government appears to be saying that it is not about increasing conviction rates, but your submission says:
“Whilst the Scottish Government Ministers have made contradictory statements whether the purpose of the pilot is to increase conviction rates, the only objective criteria for assessing the success of the proposed pilot appears to be the conviction rate.”
Can you expand a bit on where those contradictions have been made? So much has been said already about the legislation that it is quite hard to see the wood for the trees, frankly.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2024
Russell Findlay
That opens the can of worms about the judges presiding over those cases being expected, or whatever the phraseology would be, to come to the right—I say “right” in inverted commas—verdict.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2024
Russell Findlay
I have two quick questions. The first is probably just a yes or no. It picks up on John Swinney’s line of questioning. As drafted, does the legislation contain anything that would legally compel or require your members, or any solicitor, to take part in those non-jury trials?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2024
Russell Findlay
I do not want to put words in your mouth, but there is no easy or obvious fix to the issue.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2024
Russell Findlay
Thank you.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2024
Russell Findlay
Part 2 of the bill deals with trauma-informed practice. The Crown Office is in the process of implementing “Trauma Informed Justice: A Knowledge and Skills Framework for Working with Victims and Witnesses”. That raises the recurring question of whether we need legislation to enshrine trauma-informed practice, given that it is already happening in the Crown Office at your behest