The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1673 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2024
Russell Findlay
I am just amazed that the work has not been done in respect of existing trials. That is what surprises me.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2024
Russell Findlay
Everybody seems to support independent legal representation for rape victims in principle, but there are very detailed and specific concerns about how it will work in practice. The Crown Office submitted four pages of concerns. The courts, the Law Society of Scotland and the Scottish Solicitors Bar Association have all raised concerns. Those concerns are more about practicality and how it will inevitably lead to more delays in the system, which will be contrary to the interests and wellbeing of complainers. Lady Dorrian said in her evidence to us that the bill, as drafted, needs to be streamlined in that respect. What exactly is the Scottish Government doing, practically, to address all that concern?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2024
Russell Findlay
All of that makes sense when it is a preliminary hearing in advance of a trial, but there is still an issue about how that will be addressed during proceedings. Whatever the timescale, if a section 275 application is made during a trial, the complainer will have to seek legal representation and then to go through that process. That will, by its nature, cause the trial to stop while that happens.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2024
Russell Findlay
Presumably, that work will also include assessing the effect of the intervention on the ILR.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2024
Russell Findlay
Even if such numbers reduced, an accused would presumably have the right to instruct a solicitor of their choosing. Is that correct?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2024
Russell Findlay
In the Government’s response to your feedback and explanation, is there any sympathy or willingness to somehow compromise?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2024
Russell Findlay
The next question, which we have not touched on yet, is about the provision for independent legal representation in the event of a section 275 order being made. That provision has been universally supported. However, the Crown Office, the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service, the Law Society of Scotland and even Lady Dorrian have all expressed concerns that, as drafted, it would result in more churn and delays, contrary to the interests of a complainer.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2024
Russell Findlay
Good afternoon, Mr Brown. Your organisation’s written submission to the committee says:
“We are not prepared to take part in this scheme”—
that is, the juryless rape trials. When I asked the Law Society of Scotland about that, it indicated that some of its members might take part in such trials. The Faculty of Advocates told us that its members, if instructed by a solicitor, would be unable to refuse to do so, because that might be a disciplinary issue. I am trying to establish how real the threat of a boycott is.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2024
Russell Findlay
Presumably, you have raised the issue directly with the Scottish Government.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2024
Russell Findlay
Presumably, the Government is reluctant to put that up front as an explanation, because that would effectively be saying that the system is broken and does not work.