The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1673 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2024
Russell Findlay
But they do not—that is the problem.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2024
Russell Findlay
It is an exception. We did our own research. We asked all 32 councils, and we have received answers from around half of them. Aberdeenshire, West Dunbartonshire, East Ayrshire, Scottish Borders and Inverclyde all have just one dog warden each. Clackmannanshire has 0.2 dog wardens, which I assume is one dog warden working one day per week. Glasgow, despite its size and population, has one dog warden. Realistically, there is no way on earth—especially in the face of Scottish Government cuts to local authorities—that councils will increase those numbers any time soon, and they are not well placed to deal with the 1,200 dogs that are under control notices.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2024
Russell Findlay
Sure, but the existing number of dog wardens is already insufficient. Do you not agree?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2024
Russell Findlay
Is one dog warden all that is needed for the whole of Glasgow?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2024
Russell Findlay
I will be quick, convener. Christine Grahame addressed me directly, so I felt that it would be rude of me not to reply.
I believe that legislation is needed, and urgently, because we need to address the risk to public safety. We all agree that we need to address that. Where we disagree is on how we do that. In the past four weeks, Police Scotland officers have had to shoot dead two dogs in the street, both of which may or may not have been XL bullies. I know that there is an issue with definition, but if members look at the Bully Watch UK material, which is widely available, they will see that a lot of it goes some way towards explaining that.
I find it disappointing that the Scottish Government did not act more quickly. There has been a lot of to-ing and fro-ing about that today, so I will not reheat that. Having heard everything that has been said, I think that it is important that we support the measure.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2024
Russell Findlay
I have a quick observation. I am by no means an expert on the entirety of what is proposed, but I suggest that we support it. One element that caught my eye is the creation of a new measure that requires the Investigatory Powers Commissioner to notify those who have been subject to inappropriate surveillance or suchlike by the authorities. That is pertinent given recent cases, which I cannot go into detail about, in which journalists and their alleged or suspected sources were subject to inappropriate techniques by Police Scotland relating to a serious crime. If the bill helps to tighten that up and put an onus on authorities to inform those who have been subject to such wrongful methods, that can only be a good thing.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2024
Russell Findlay
However, she wanted to take it a step further in that she wanted to have an additional protection or mechanism of seeking a retrial if, for example, only seven out of 12 jurors believed in the accused’s guilt. Will the Government agree to the request by the Crown for the bill to be amended to include the capacity to seek a retrial?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2024
Russell Findlay
I think that the Crown’s submission was that, in the event of a seven out of 12 verdict, for example, it would be able to ask the court for a retrial. Thank you.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2024
Russell Findlay
Has NES been through your door with that particular request?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2024
Russell Findlay
Thank you.