Skip to main content

Language: English / Gàidhlig

Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 6 May 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1673 contributions

|

Criminal Justice Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 21 February 2024

Russell Findlay

But they do not—that is the problem.

Criminal Justice Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 21 February 2024

Russell Findlay

It is an exception. We did our own research. We asked all 32 councils, and we have received answers from around half of them. Aberdeenshire, West Dunbartonshire, East Ayrshire, Scottish Borders and Inverclyde all have just one dog warden each. Clackmannanshire has 0.2 dog wardens, which I assume is one dog warden working one day per week. Glasgow, despite its size and population, has one dog warden. Realistically, there is no way on earth—especially in the face of Scottish Government cuts to local authorities—that councils will increase those numbers any time soon, and they are not well placed to deal with the 1,200 dogs that are under control notices.

Criminal Justice Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 21 February 2024

Russell Findlay

Sure, but the existing number of dog wardens is already insufficient. Do you not agree?

Criminal Justice Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 21 February 2024

Russell Findlay

Is one dog warden all that is needed for the whole of Glasgow?

Criminal Justice Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 21 February 2024

Russell Findlay

I will be quick, convener. Christine Grahame addressed me directly, so I felt that it would be rude of me not to reply.

I believe that legislation is needed, and urgently, because we need to address the risk to public safety. We all agree that we need to address that. Where we disagree is on how we do that. In the past four weeks, Police Scotland officers have had to shoot dead two dogs in the street, both of which may or may not have been XL bullies. I know that there is an issue with definition, but if members look at the Bully Watch UK material, which is widely available, they will see that a lot of it goes some way towards explaining that.

I find it disappointing that the Scottish Government did not act more quickly. There has been a lot of to-ing and fro-ing about that today, so I will not reheat that. Having heard everything that has been said, I think that it is important that we support the measure.

Criminal Justice Committee

Investigatory Powers (Amendment) Bill

Meeting date: 21 February 2024

Russell Findlay

I have a quick observation. I am by no means an expert on the entirety of what is proposed, but I suggest that we support it. One element that caught my eye is the creation of a new measure that requires the Investigatory Powers Commissioner to notify those who have been subject to inappropriate surveillance or suchlike by the authorities. That is pertinent given recent cases, which I cannot go into detail about, in which journalists and their alleged or suspected sources were subject to inappropriate techniques by Police Scotland relating to a serious crime. If the bill helps to tighten that up and put an onus on authorities to inform those who have been subject to such wrongful methods, that can only be a good thing.

Criminal Justice Committee

Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 7 February 2024

Russell Findlay

However, she wanted to take it a step further in that she wanted to have an additional protection or mechanism of seeking a retrial if, for example, only seven out of 12 jurors believed in the accused’s guilt. Will the Government agree to the request by the Crown for the bill to be amended to include the capacity to seek a retrial?

Criminal Justice Committee

Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 7 February 2024

Russell Findlay

I think that the Crown’s submission was that, in the event of a seven out of 12 verdict, for example, it would be able to ask the court for a retrial. Thank you.

Criminal Justice Committee

Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 7 February 2024

Russell Findlay

Has NES been through your door with that particular request?

Criminal Justice Committee

Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 7 February 2024

Russell Findlay

Thank you.