Skip to main content

Language: English / Gàidhlig

Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 6 May 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1673 contributions

|

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 6 March 2024

Russell Findlay

No, I am content—we are in agreement. I am glad that we can look at those points.

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 6 March 2024

Russell Findlay

Is this a final position, or will we have more time?

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Criminal Justice Bill

Meeting date: 6 March 2024

Russell Findlay

In respect of one of the clauses, the need for it to be UK-wide relates to prohibiting the purchase and trade of pill presses. According to the Parliament website, the Scottish Government has been talking to the Home Office about that for at least two years. It would obviously create a big problem if pill presses were outlawed in the rest of the UK but not here, so I think that that one is straightforward.

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 6 March 2024

Russell Findlay

I have comments on both SSIs; I will start with the one on firefighters that Katy Clark has just mentioned. I see that the Scottish Government has put a wrong date in it. It is a mistake, and it does not look like it will have any impact whatsoever, but the DPLR Committee has said to us that the date should be corrected. The date relates to death-in-service payments for firefighters. The Scottish Government has said that, even though the wrong date is on the order, any applications for payment would be honoured if they are received by what is considered to be the correct date. The Government’s position appears to be “trust us”—applications after the date on the order are not likely to happen and, if they were to happen, the Scottish Government would respect them. I think that that is in writing.

I wonder whether, for technical reasons and in line with what the DPLR Committee has asked, we should consider ensuring that the date is fixed before the SSI proceeds, or whether we are happy with the SSI as it is and that it is just a technical matter.

I turn to the SSI on sex offender notification. Essentially, it removes Tain from the list of police stations in which a registered sex offender notification requirement can be fulfilled. A Sunday Post investigation earlier this year found that there has been a significant rise in the number of registered sex offenders in the Highlands—it has gone up 50 per cent in two years. That is attributed to people who are on the registered sex offender list seeking to go somewhere where they are perhaps not known.

I note that, on page 7 of paper 2, the Scottish Government says that

“the local councillor ... has been informed”

of the change for the police station. It says “local councillor” in singular, but the ward of Tain in Easter Ross has three councillors, and I am curious to know whether they have all been consulted. I dare say that they would not particularly object to registered sex offenders no longer attending at their local police station. Perhaps more importantly, have the councillors in the police station area where those offenders are now to be directed been consulted? I do not want to slow the process, but I put that out there.

Criminal Justice Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 21 February 2024

Russell Findlay

You and your officials have talked about the system of dog wardens in Scotland, which are controlled by local authorities. In your answer to my colleague Sharon Dowey a moment ago, you mentioned that 1,200 dogs are subject to dog control notices. Do you happen to know how many dog wardens there are in Scotland?

Criminal Justice Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 21 February 2024

Russell Findlay

Minister, you have told us today that there has been a lack of respect towards the Scottish Government. We are perhaps losing sight of what the measures are about, however. They are about preventing children and adults from being maimed and killed by XL bullies. Surely you agree that public protection is paramount rather than constitutional issues or bruised egos within the Scottish Government.

Criminal Justice Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 21 February 2024

Russell Findlay

Sure, but the legislation was in the public domain in mid-September; you could have acted more quickly if you had chosen to do so.

Criminal Justice Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 21 February 2024

Russell Findlay

Your officials have working connections with officials at UK level. It sounds like you are making excuses.

Criminal Justice Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 21 February 2024

Russell Findlay

The reason for the controls being brought in is to protect public safety after a spate of horrific attacks, some of which were fatal and some of which involved children. Our thoughts are with all those who have been harmed or lost their lives in those attacks.

We whole-heartedly welcome the Scottish Government finally coming to the right decision. I would like to know—was this a case of spectacularly poor judgment or dithering, or was it simply an opportunity to seek divergence from the rest of the UK?

Criminal Justice Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 21 February 2024

Russell Findlay

For weeks if not months, the Scottish Government was warned by the UK Government, politicians in the Scottish Parliament, the media and experts that this was an inevitable consequence of the rest of the UK legislation.

You said in your opening statement that dog attacks are rare, but there have been two XL bully attacks in Scotland in the past month, one of which was just three days ago. In both those attacks, people were harmed, and both were so serious that Police Scotland had to use firearms to kill the animals. Reportedly, both of those dogs came from elsewhere in the UK. Do you therefore regret not acting quicker?