The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1673 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 27 March 2024
Russell Findlay
I will have to go back to compare and contrast the two things.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 27 March 2024
Russell Findlay
I am looking to the convener to see whether we are allowed to have a whole debate about the issue, because I suspect that we might not be.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 27 March 2024
Russell Findlay
So you do not believe in this legislation.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 27 March 2024
Russell Findlay
We believe in the legislation. We support it, but if you are saying that it is about deed, not breed—[Interruption.] I am sorry, but John Swinney is trying to interrupt. I would like to ask the minister a question.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 27 March 2024
Russell Findlay
That was incoherent, but thank you for trying to answer the question.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 27 March 2024
Russell Findlay
I think that I should come in, because Christine Grahame quoted me directly. It was not clear exactly where the quote ended, but I did not recognise—
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 27 March 2024
Russell Findlay
Was that from the previous committee meeting?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 27 March 2024
Russell Findlay
The transcript that I am looking at differs somewhat, so I wanted to question that.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 27 March 2024
Russell Findlay
My point is that we believe that the legislation is necessary because public safety is paramount. These dogs are maiming and killing people across the UK, including in Scotland, which is why it is so important—
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 March 2024
Russell Findlay
I understand Pauline McNeill’s concerns, and I have a few other points to make.
The UK Criminal Justice Bill is substantial. There are 79 clauses in the bill as introduced, and the Scottish Government is asking us to consent to six of them—clauses 1 to 4, 14 and 21. They relate to a variety of subjects, including organised crime, child exploitation, printed guns, devices used in vehicle theft and that kind of thing. I whole-heartedly agree with what those clauses do, and it is important to note that the papers cite the importance of UK-wide consistency in these matters and the potential repercussions for public safety if there were to be any divergence. It is good to see the two Governments working so effectively together.
However, I have outstanding questions on the remaining 73 clauses—one or two clauses in particular jump out. Politically, there will not be agreement between both Governments on all the matters. However, clause 23 of the bill as introduced creates a new statutory aggravating factor in respect of child grooming. On the face of it, I cannot see any cause to disagree with that, but the Scottish Government has not chosen to duplicate, replicate or adopt it—whatever the phrase is. I do not know its reasons for that.
My other point is that I understand that there is an amendment to the bill that relates to the prohibition of registered sex offenders changing their names, which is a hot issue. The Scottish Government has been asked about that issue and has spoken about it. Is the Scottish Government in discussion with the UK Government about adopting that measure at a later date?