The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1673 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2024
Russell Findlay
Was there a conversation about that between Unison and the Government prior to publication of the bill?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2024
Russell Findlay
Does that not bring us back to the point about complaints going unresolved? The person presumably cannot be penalised by a new employer, because the complaint dies upon their exit from service.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2024
Russell Findlay
Okay. Thank you.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2024
Russell Findlay
I will start with Dr Lennon and pick up on something that you have already referred to, which was about the proposed code of ethics. You said in your written submission—and in your verbal contribution—that, for the code to be effective, it should be monitored. You used Northern Ireland as an example of where it happens effectively and suggested that the Scottish Police Authority could do the same, but you also say that it could be achieved by amending existing legislation, specifically the Police and Fire Reform (Scotland) Act 2012. In layman’s terms, why is this so important and why is it needed? Have you had any discussions with or feedback from the Scottish Government since your written evidence was submitted and published?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2024
Russell Findlay
Thank you.
Stephanie Griffin, I will ask you about the duty of candour provision in the bill. We have written evidence from the Association of Scottish Police Superintendents that suggests that the duty of candour provision might be at odds with existing legislation that gives everyone the right to silence or to protect themselves against self-incrimination. I think that the Scottish Police Federation has said something similar to us. Are you aware of a likely clash between those two rights, or is that likelihood overstated?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2024
Russell Findlay
We have seen cases already in the public domain that have cost huge sums of money to settle and, according to the officers involved, that was needless. They wanted a resolution and it could have been happened much more quickly and efficiently. A report that HMICS produced in December 2023 says:
“Misconduct and grievance processes are perceived as lacking openness, transparency, fairness and pace of resolution. There was a general lack of trust in these processes, and we found they are having a direct and often damaging short and longer term impact on individuals and teams”.
That pretty much reflects what you have just acknowledged. Would any part of the bill support your members who find themselves in that position?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2024
Russell Findlay
Thank you.
Kate Wallace, I will turn to you now. I want to quickly touch on a very brief selection of comments from some of the witnesses we have heard from so far. Stephanie Bonner, the mother of a child who died, called the complaints process
“a hellish merry-go-round of distractions, deceit, deception and manipulation”.
Maggie Robertson, who was a victim of rape, has said
“the system needs to be changed completely.”
Bill Johnstone, who was falsely assigned a criminal record, said:
“The system is ... not fit for purpose”
and
“fatally flawed.”—[Official Report, Criminal Justice Committee, 17 April 2024; c 2, 25, 12.]
Margaret Gribbon, a lawyer who represents police whistleblowers, talked of
“weaponisation of the complaints handling procedure.”—[Official Report, Criminal Justice Committee, 24 April 2024; c 4.]
I suppose that many of those people represent different definitions of victim. From the perspective of VSS, can you give us an idea of what kinds of cases you typically see relating to police negligence, misconduct and criminality and say how they might be relevant to the need for this legislation?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2024
Russell Findlay
Would an easy fix be to amend the bill to preclude civilian staff?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2024
Russell Findlay
Are you actively lobbying the Government on that?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2024
Russell Findlay
Based on that estimate, you are thinking of five times £5.8 million, potentially?