The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1673 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Russell Findlay
I would like to return to the point that was raised by Rona Mackay on the HM Inspectorate of Prosecution in Scotland report from 2021, which talked about CAAPD freezing cases, and you have already referred to that. The detail of that report is actually quite shocking. It said that cases were frozen while you were gathering or requesting additional work to be done. In some cases, I think that it reset the clock rather than just paused it.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Russell Findlay
That answer illustrates neatly how complicated the landscape is for a member of the public. If that were represented as a flow chart, it would be quite confusing.
Communication with complainers—whether they are police officers or members of the public—is vital. To go back to the HMIPS report, it said that communication from CAAPD was unsatisfactory in four in 10 of the 80 cases that were looked at. The report contains quite detailed accounts, some of which are pretty shocking, to be frank.
You came into your post when that report was produced. What can you say about the quality of communication from CAAPD now?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Russell Findlay
I do not want to put words in your mouth, but, as the PIRC, are you now confident that, if similar cases arose now or in the future, Police Scotland would treat them properly?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Russell Findlay
That is interesting.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Russell Findlay
I will raise a small point. The meeting papers say that there has been some defective drafting of the order, which should be fixed. The papers say that the Scottish Government “intends to rectify” that at the “earliest opportunity”.
Not so long ago—in fact, in March—the committee considered a Scottish statutory instrument that had the wrong date on it due to another Scottish Government error. The Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee said that that date should have been corrected. That might or might not have been done—I do not expect you to know the answer to that, cabinet secretary, but I assume that it has been. I do not mean to sound too critical, but it is quite something that we have had two fairly fundamental mistakes in papers that have come to the committee about orders and SSIs. What are your views on that?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Russell Findlay
Would you rather see that provision removed from the bill?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Russell Findlay
So, cases can be prosecuted or not prosecuted, but you also presumably have the same alternative disposals, such as diversion from prosecution. Are they utilised for police officers?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Russell Findlay
Do you have any data that you could share with us on that? It would be quite interesting to see.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Russell Findlay
Can those court colleagues make a decision to divert from prosecution?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Russell Findlay
The only Scottish MP on the relevant committee did not say anything during the debate, as far as I can see from Hansard. The UK minister said that the Scottish Government was instead
“sticking with section 184 of the Online Safety Act for now.”—[Official Report, House of Commons, 11 January 2024; Vol 743, c 163.]
Is it the case, then, that the protections in that legislation will be relied on instead?