The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1673 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Russell Findlay
Can those court colleagues make a decision to divert from prosecution?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Russell Findlay
The only Scottish MP on the relevant committee did not say anything during the debate, as far as I can see from Hansard. The UK minister said that the Scottish Government was instead
“sticking with section 184 of the Online Safety Act for now.”—[Official Report, House of Commons, 11 January 2024; Vol 743, c 163.]
Is it the case, then, that the protections in that legislation will be relied on instead?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Russell Findlay
Am I allowed to ask one more question, convener?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Russell Findlay
Are all of those assaults?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Russell Findlay
Thank you very much.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Russell Findlay
The language used by the inspector was that freezing cases was “open to abuse” and was being used inappropriately “for no discernible reason”. The report also states that CAAPD
“had developed an unhealthy and misguided approach to managing its targets”,
and that it
“masked the reality of what was happening”
and misled everyone from the general public right through to the Lord Advocate.
I understand that you have put that right. Given that report, and the fact that we have heard so much evidence from witnesses about a lack of trust, do you believe that the public can trust the data that is coming from CAAPD?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Russell Findlay
There was another case subsequent to that one in which a female police officer from the Moray area made multiple internal allegations of an employment nature and a criminal nature, which were kept in-house and withheld from the relevant authorities. That officer has also been publicly critical of the PIRC. Although the PIRC unblocked that case by identifying and investigating those allegations, which, up until then, had not been done, the subsequent report into the entire case has not been published. Can you explain why that would be?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Russell Findlay
I would just be interested to know whether, given the increased use of diversion from prosecution within the broader criminal justice system, we are seeing that mirrored in the cases that you deal with.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Russell Findlay
That leads me on to my next question. We have heard evidence of cases in which complainers, whether members of the public or police officers, believed that what they had imparted had subsequently been shared with CAAPD—as is right and proper—but that had not been the case. Are you confident that the situation has improved, now that a lot more scrutiny is being applied to those particular cases and the wider issues, or can the legislation itself be improved to ensure that that does happen?
12:00Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Russell Findlay
One of the non-legislative recommendations of the Angiolini review was that the PIRC should investigate all on-duty allegations of assault made against police officers. That has been happening since October 2021 and it has had a significant impact on your workload. Can you quantify what that has meant for the organisation in typical numbers of cases or as a proportion of your workload?