The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1673 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 27 October 2021
Russell Findlay
I thank Peter Krykant, Becky Wood, Louise Stevenson and Natalie Logan MacLean for their testimonies, which were very moving. I express my condolences to Peter for his loss.
So far, much of our focus has been on what might be described as street-level drug use and drug dealing, but every single pill, rock or tenner bag comes from organised crime, and organised crime activities are estimated to cost the Scottish economy about £2 billion a year. That is a much-quoted figure, although I am not entirely sure where it comes from. According to the Crown Office’s submission to the committee, the value of proceeds of crime confiscation orders relating to drugs last year was about £1 million. It has long been said by many people who are involved in criminal justice that the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 has failed and is failing. Mr McGeehan and Mr Conway, do you agree with that interpretation? What can be done to improve the targeting of those at the high end of organised crime?
11:00Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 27 October 2021
Russell Findlay
That is helpful.
I wonder whether Mr Conway would like to answer that point from the police perspective. Is the proceeds of crime legislation robust enough, or could it be improved?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 27 October 2021
Russell Findlay
According to a written submission to the committee, serious crime prevention orders, which I think were introduced in 2007, have been used on 70 occasions for those who have been convicted and on one occasion for someone who had not been convicted. Of those 70 who had the orders, 13 are now in the community and subject to monitoring. I presume that the other 57 will join them in due course. Does Police Scotland believe that it has sufficient resources to monitor those people effectively on their release?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 27 October 2021
Russell Findlay
No problem.
Another issue is that the general direction of travel is to treat Scotland’s drugs problem—or drugs crisis—as a public health issue. As we know, however, a large number of serious organised criminals are making a lot of money out of the death of people across communities in Scotland and are inflicting violence on our streets. In one of the submissions that it made to the committee, the Crown Office lists a number of cases as examples of successful prosecutions against organised crime. One that stood out related to an individual who has not been identified—although it is apparent who it is just from googling—who has high-level links to organised crime, both in Scotland and overseas. The drugs that he was involved in had a multimillion-pound value. Ultimately, he was sentenced to eight years’ imprisonment, which means, realistically, that he could be out after as little as four years. He is not a problem drug user, and this is not a public health issue—he is a high-level organised criminal. I just wonder, Mr McGeehan and Mr Conway, whether you think that the courts truly understand what needs to be done in respect of those people, who are making so much money from drugs.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 27 October 2021
Russell Findlay
Sure. I would be interested in knowing whether a stand-alone unit has the monitoring remit or whether it is put on to the divisions, which already have a lot of competing pressures and roles to fulfil.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 6 October 2021
Russell Findlay
I want to go back to the point about local firms competing for the same pot of money. We have heard previously from Scottish Women’s Aid about a lack of specialist solicitors in respect of offences in which women are victims. Is the direct employment of more solicitors by the board a likely direction of travel that will help to resolve that? Are you actively seeking to achieve that or—let us face it—are you up against the resistance of law firms and their lobby, who are pretty hostile to the idea?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 6 October 2021
Russell Findlay
Can I ask one question of the SPA?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 6 October 2021
Russell Findlay
This is budgetary. It is on NDAs and it is for Mr Brown. Have you had any discussions with the police on the use of NDAs and how they can impact on budgets, or do you expect to?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 6 October 2021
Russell Findlay
Are you exploring or have you explored the creation of a specialist provision within the framework that you already have?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 6 October 2021
Russell Findlay
I would like to ask about Police Scotland’s use of non-disclosure agreements, which, for people who are not aware of them, are used in the payment of compensation deals to keep the details of those pay-outs secret or confidential. It has been reported that the value of such claims has breached £1 million since 2013, and that raises serious questions about transparency and accountability for public money.
Just today, we heard about a successful tribunal claim that was brought by a female police officer called Rhona Malone. Her career was destroyed by what was described as a “boys’ club” culture. She had been offered a settlement on the condition that she signed a non-disclosure agreement. Mr Gray, are such agreements compatible with good governance, public confidence and accountability?