The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1673 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 December 2021
Russell Findlay
I asked Mr Graham whether a rape victim would be informed should this situation transpire. I understand that it has not yet happened, but that might be because this is a new development. It is clearly causing women across Scotland significant concern. How do you think a woman who had been raped would feel if she found that her attacker had been categorised as a woman by Police Scotland?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 December 2021
Russell Findlay
Okay. Convener, do I have time to go back to the line of questioning that Katy Clark was pursuing?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 December 2021
Russell Findlay
Sure. This is largely theoretical, but if you follow it to its logical conclusion, you might have rape victims in court having to call their alleged rapist “she”.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 December 2021
Russell Findlay
Good morning, DCC Graham. It has been reported that Police Scotland may record rape as having been committed by a woman when the alleged male-born rapist does not have a gender recognition certificate. How did Police Scotland arrive at that decision?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 December 2021
Russell Findlay
I did not catch the beginning of your answer—I do not know whether it was a tech problem. Are you saying that you do not agree with your predecessor Mr MacAskill?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 December 2021
Russell Findlay
That has not happened yet, but there is a possibility that it might. The question is: what would transpire? Would a female victim be informed that the alleged rapist was choosing to identify as female?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 December 2021
Russell Findlay
Good morning, Mr Brown. We have heard from Police Scotland that it might record rape as being committed by a woman when the alleged male-born rapist does not have a gender recognition certificate. There are many concerns about that, not least that it could corrupt crime statistics. You spoke in your opening remarks about the importance of accurate data collection. A former Scottish National Party justice secretary has called that a “legal absurdity”. Do you agree with him?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 December 2021
Russell Findlay
I should quickly clarify that what I meant by the phrase “new development” was the recent confirmation from Police Scotland with regard to how this could be applied.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 November 2021
Russell Findlay
Good morning. For the sake of the record, I will pick up on what was said about the UK Government’s decision to leave the EU. The decision was in fact the result of a referendum—the decision was made by the electorate, not the Government.
On Crown Office funding, last week, we heard evidence from the Crown Agent, David Harvie, that digital transformation is funded by capital, the budget for which has been flat for 10 years. The Crown Office has identified significant opportunities for improvements with investment, yet the capital budget is expected to rise by around only £500,000 next year, and remain at a standstill thereafter. Is that sufficient to clear the huge backlog that exists and give the Crown Office and its partners the required infrastructure to tackle the backlog?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 November 2021
Russell Findlay
Is the Crown Office satisfied with the fairly modest rise in the capital budget? Have you had any feedback from it? Is it content?