The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1673 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 2 March 2022
Russell Findlay
I am told that Vicki Bell’s connection has been repaired and she is back with us.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 2 March 2022
Russell Findlay
Oops.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 2 March 2022
Russell Findlay
We have a couple more questions on that subject, the first of which comes from Pauline McNeill.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 2 March 2022
Russell Findlay
We are just about out of our scheduled time, but we can continue for five or 10 more minutes, if the witnesses are happy to stay with us.
The next area of questioning relates to the power to release prisoners early. Rona Mackay and Jamie Greene have indicated that they would like to ask questions on that subject.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 2 March 2022
Russell Findlay
We have a question from Audrey Nicoll, who is joining us remotely.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 23 February 2022
Russell Findlay
Sure. It is quite a specific thing. The exemption is for people who are subject to sex offender notification requirements. Does that mean that prisoners who have committed other sexual offences might not be exempt and could be released early? Do we know that?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 23 February 2022
Russell Findlay
I have a question for Teresa Medhurst on an issue that she touched on earlier. Many people would be concerned about a Government’s ability to release people early from prison. We have heard all sorts of evidence about what happened. You talked about mitigation in relation to prisoners who have been released. Given that it was a coronavirus public health requirement, were they all tested for Covid prior to their release?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 23 February 2022
Russell Findlay
Why is that happening? Is there suddenly a sense that victims are not protected and need that additional help?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 23 February 2022
Russell Findlay
We have heard that victims were not told about the emergency legislation on early release and you were inundated by requests for information. From what my colleague Jamie Greene said, we also know that 40 per cent of the people who were released went on to reoffend quite quickly. We do not know the details of that reoffending. It looks like there is a complete imbalance in the system, which has little regard for victims. However, I will get off my soapbox and ask a question.
The early release scheme should not apply to prisoners who are subject to sex offender notification requirements. However, I wonder whether the definition of people who have been convicted of sexual crimes is narrow and specific and whether the exemption could have been, and may yet be, used for prisoners who have been convicted of other crimes of a sexual nature in which the victims are primarily women and girls.
That question is open to either or both of the witnesses.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 23 February 2022
Russell Findlay
Have you had discussions with the Government about ensuring that testing would take place if early release was enacted again?