The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1673 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2022
Russell Findlay
So there is nothing distinctly different about Scotland that makes our numbers higher.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2022
Russell Findlay
You mentioned Finland and its commission. Obviously, we do not want to talk about lifting things wholesale, but did that result in new legislation in Finland, or was it just a question of taking a good look at the existing systems and making them better? The question is whether we really need yet more legislation. Can the issue not be fixed with the right intent from all the agencies that are involved?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2022
Russell Findlay
Good morning. In your submission, you talk about the “historic high” that remand is at—it is up to 30 per cent—but you concede that remanding people is sometimes necessary. Have you given any thought to what level would be comfortable or reasonable for your organisation?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2022
Russell Findlay
Do the other two witnesses have a view on that?
12:00Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2022
Russell Findlay
It is not a closed door, as far as the Scottish Government is concerned—is that a reasonable interpretation? Are you willing to look at whatever form it might take?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2022
Russell Findlay
I want to touch quickly on something that Helen Nisbet said about the letter, which Jamie Greene suggested should be made public, if possible. Is it already in the public domain?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2022
Russell Findlay
As a continuation of that, if not through this bill—clearly, you have serious misgivings about it—do you agree in principle that, given the sensitivities of the troubles and everything that goes with them, a United Kingdom-wide approach is preferable and, indeed, necessary?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2022
Russell Findlay
There is probably universal agreement that truth and justice are paramount, and we should not lose sight of the fact that that is the intent behind the bill. So many families have still not got answers after so many decades. I was reassured that the cabinet secretary agrees with that principle. Importantly, he also seems to agree with the need for a UK-wide approach.
I cannot agree with Rona Mackay’s interpretation of this being some kind of nefarious mission creep into the Scottish justice system. To oppose the bill on principle would be wrong and, indeed, premature. Pressing pause, as has been proposed, is the right thing to do, for the reasons that have been outlined by Jamie Greene and others.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2022
Russell Findlay
I would like to come back in briefly to touch on what I said before and to put it into some context. The exchange in committee in which I asked about officer suicide numbers was on 18 May. The later exchange was on 7 September, when I quoted from a letter from the SPA to the committee. It stated:
“Based on the information available at that time, there was nothing to suggest that any of the recent cases were caused directly by the pressure of work.”
I disagree with that point, because there is an abundance of accounts and evidence to hand that completely contradict it. That is the kind of thing that a fatal accident inquiry should and would have looked at.
I have one other small but important point. There are other cases—at least one—in which an officer attempted suicide and was then required to sign a non-disclosure agreement. We are told that non-disclosure agreements are being used properly, in line with the Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service guidance, and not to keep people quiet. Again, that is part of the problem.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2022
Russell Findlay
That is great. Thank you.