The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1673 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Russell Findlay
About halfway through the letter, in the last paragraph on the first page, we learn that virtual summary domestic abuse trials have been taking place for three years. The cabinet secretary tells us that that has been at the direction of the Lord Justice General, which makes perfect sense, but I am somewhat surprised that he goes on to say that, if we want to know how many trials have actually taken place, he and the Scottish Government do not have that information. I find that surprising, because we have already had a bit of to and fro on the matter. It should not be this difficult to get such basic data. There has been some anecdotal suggestion that the numbers are very small.
The cabinet secretary goes on to say in the following paragraph that the powers will run for the next 10 months and then expire, but that they can be extended until 2025. In one breath, we are talking about not having the basic data but, in the next, we are talking about extending the powers without that basic data. It is really poor.
We have been battered around a bit on transcripts. We have not had a clear explanation from anyone of how much they cost. My understanding is that a private company provides the service. One thing that strikes me about Parliament is how quickly transcribed debates are online—it is incredibly efficient. I am not saying that the courts could do that easily or without cost, but we have not had an explanation as to why it cannot be done properly.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Russell Findlay
The existing crimes that occur while people are on bail need not happen in a system that is fully reformed across the board. Is that a fair assessment?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Russell Findlay
I would like to pick up on another issue, convener. Is that okay? Do we have time?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Russell Findlay
My first question relates to bail. As we know, judges make the decision about whether someone should be remanded. The judiciary have expressed some opposition to the bill. They seem to be downright hostile to it, but it is difficult for us to interpret that, because they have declined our invitations to give evidence and answer questions, which is making our job a bit more difficult than it should be.
Hannah, you are on the Scottish Sentencing Council. You are not a judge, but you are perhaps the closest that we will get to hearing from that sector. I know that you are not speaking for the Scottish Sentencing Council, because you have already said so. Can any of you give me any sense of what the opposition to the bill is? Is it perceived to be meddling in judicial independence? Do you think that the judiciary should give evidence to the committee?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Russell Findlay
If an individual is bailed but subject to electronic monitoring, when it comes to sentencing, should any consideration be given to the restrictions that they were under prior to that?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Russell Findlay
Is the civil service working on both potential scenarios?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Russell Findlay
When is the procurement process due to conclude?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Russell Findlay
That is what I was trying to establish. Thank you.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Russell Findlay
I agree with Collette Stevenson that this is, indeed, about justice for victims, but I disagree with Rona Mackay, who is fundamentally more opposed to the bill in principle.
It is worth bearing in mind that the intent behind the bill is to achieve justice and answers for those who have spent decades not being able to get any, and it is a very sensitive and unique situation.
It is also worth bearing in mind that, when I spoke to the cabinet secretary during the evidence session, he seemed to agree with the principle of the United Kingdom-wide approach, so it would be somewhat hasty to oppose the bill, because it is more important that we seek to overcome any incompatibility or issues between the various parts of the UK.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Russell Findlay
Do you have any notion of timescale and when we might know?