The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1673 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Russell Findlay
The written submission from Dr Graham and Professor McNeill is 12 pages long and there is a lot of strong opinion in it. In the past, Dr Graham, you have been politically critical of me and my party. We are thick skinned and it is entirely your prerogative, but I wonder whether such political commentary risks undermining academic neutrality. I also wonder how that reflects our ability to assess the evidence that you have submitted. Is it personal opinion, academic research or something in between?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Russell Findlay
I want to respond quickly to what Collette Stevenson said about the two on-going bits of research. The letter specifies a completion date of spring this year for the Ipsos MORI research. For the other one, it simply says that the analysis will be concluded “in due course”. It is perhaps worth seeking some clarity on that in relation to the issue at hand regarding summary trials, as it could be useful to get a steer from the Scottish Government.
13:00Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Russell Findlay
Good morning. The intent of the bill is to reduce the number of people on remand and therefore to increase the number of people who are granted bail. We already know that one in eight crimes are committed by people who are on bail.
In your submission, you say:
“The unfortunate reality of more individuals being released on bail that would otherwise be remanded will mean an increase of individuals who commit crime whilst on bail.”
We also hear later in the committee’s paper from some academics who address the same point in their written submission. They say that bail reform
“need not be causally associated with increases in crime.”
Can you explain that a bit more? There seems to be a contradiction there. On the one hand, victims organisations say that more bail equals more crime, and the data that exists suggests that that is the case, but, on the other hand, some academic research or opinion appears to suggest otherwise.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Russell Findlay
It is about electronic monitoring as time served.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Russell Findlay
On page 7 of the paper, you say:
“Time spent on electronic monitoring should be no substitute for time that should have been spent in prison as part of a sentence.”
I turn to the submission from the academics. They suggest that, at the time of sentencing, it would be reasonable to treat two days spent on electronic monitoring as the equivalent of one day in custody. Have you come across that formula or suggestion, and do you agree with it?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Russell Findlay
Should they come and see us?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Russell Findlay
Thank you. Convener, have I time for another question?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Russell Findlay
Is that partly ideological and partly because there are offenders who play the system and prolong proceedings? We know that they churn cases. Is that a softer way of doing time?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Russell Findlay
Thank you.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Russell Findlay
Yes, thank you.