The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1673 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Russell Findlay
The written submission from Dr Graham and Professor McNeill is 12 pages long and there is a lot of strong opinion in it. In the past, Dr Graham, you have been politically critical of me and my party. We are thick skinned and it is entirely your prerogative, but I wonder whether such political commentary risks undermining academic neutrality. I also wonder how that reflects our ability to assess the evidence that you have submitted. Is it personal opinion, academic research or something in between?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Russell Findlay
I want to respond quickly to what Collette Stevenson said about the two on-going bits of research. The letter specifies a completion date of spring this year for the Ipsos MORI research. For the other one, it simply says that the analysis will be concluded “in due course”. It is perhaps worth seeking some clarity on that in relation to the issue at hand regarding summary trials, as it could be useful to get a steer from the Scottish Government.
13:00Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Russell Findlay
What is the timescale for that? When do the clerks need to know about any queries or amendments?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Russell Findlay
Good morning. The intent of the bill is to reduce the number of people on remand and therefore to increase the number of people who are granted bail. We already know that one in eight crimes are committed by people who are on bail.
In your submission, you say:
“The unfortunate reality of more individuals being released on bail that would otherwise be remanded will mean an increase of individuals who commit crime whilst on bail.”
We also hear later in the committee’s paper from some academics who address the same point in their written submission. They say that bail reform
“need not be causally associated with increases in crime.”
Can you explain that a bit more? There seems to be a contradiction there. On the one hand, victims organisations say that more bail equals more crime, and the data that exists suggests that that is the case, but, on the other hand, some academic research or opinion appears to suggest otherwise.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Russell Findlay
It is about electronic monitoring as time served.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Russell Findlay
On page 7 of the paper, you say:
“Time spent on electronic monitoring should be no substitute for time that should have been spent in prison as part of a sentence.”
I turn to the submission from the academics. They suggest that, at the time of sentencing, it would be reasonable to treat two days spent on electronic monitoring as the equivalent of one day in custody. Have you come across that formula or suggestion, and do you agree with it?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Russell Findlay
Should they come and see us?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Russell Findlay
Thank you. Convener, have I time for another question?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Russell Findlay
Is that partly ideological and partly because there are offenders who play the system and prolong proceedings? We know that they churn cases. Is that a softer way of doing time?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Russell Findlay
Thank you.