The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1673 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2023
Russell Findlay
In Smith v M, there is a go-to definition.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2023
Russell Findlay
Good morning. David Mackie, I was struck by your written submission. On page 25, you say:
“This is an opportunity to challenge the entrenched practices of some members of the judiciary who appear to accept the Crown’s opposition to bail applications too readily”.
On page 24, you say that, if this bill is enacted:
“We would suggest that significant cultural change—particularly amongst some parts of the Crown and judiciary—will be required for these changes to take effect”.
You are a former sheriff, so you come to this with that perspective. Can you expand a bit on the cultural blockages and issues that exist and the direction of travel? Are they less prevalent than they used to be? I do not want to surmise or put words in your mouth.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2023
Russell Findlay
Good afternoon. The Scottish Police Federation has submitted some written evidence. The federation is not entirely sure what problem needs to be fixed. It is of the view that its members see people being granted police bail almost as a matter of routine and that the majority of those who have been kept in custody are granted bail by the court. Do you think that there is a slight disconnect between the reality of what is happening on the ground and what we are hearing from some of our witnesses, which is that too many people are being remanded?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2023
Russell Findlay
Okay. Thank you. As far as I am aware, we will not be given evidence in person by the SPF. In response to the release of people from prison, it says that Police Scotland is already
“struggling with the management of high-risk offenders and cannot safely manage this within current resourcing arrangements”.
Do you agree with that interpretation that, right now, Police Scotland cannot manage high-risk offenders in the community? Whatever your answer to that, what happens next if the bill is passed?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2023
Russell Findlay
Thank you.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2023
Russell Findlay
We can do without the courts having to interpret more legislation from this Parliament; we get enough of that already.
Would either of the other witnesses care to address that point? It has been very well explained. I have something else that we can move on to if you prefer.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2023
Russell Findlay
Presumably, the bill seeks to narrow that definition.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2023
Russell Findlay
Another element that has been referred to is section 23D. My understanding is that, in section 23D of the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995, there is a presumption against bail for certain types of offences, including violent offences, sexual offences and domestic abuse offences at summary level and drug trafficking at solemn level, if there is a previous conviction to that effect. That might be overly simplified, but that is more or less it.
All of today’s witnesses are for the abolition of section 23D, but we heard last week from victims groups who are of the view that it should be retained. Do their views cause you to rethink that in any way? If it is to be abolished, could or should it be replaced by something else to give protections to victims?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2023
Russell Findlay
Indeed. Thank you.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Russell Findlay
What is the timescale for that? When do the clerks need to know about any queries or amendments?