The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1673 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2023
Russell Findlay
There is a huge amount of detail. We have had 21 witnesses so far, with many more to come, and there will be lots of talking in future. However, it is helpful to understand that there is a direction of travel in the criminal justice community.
If the other witnesses want to come in on that, they can, but I have a specific question about prison.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2023
Russell Findlay
I wonder whether that might slow down the process on the day.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2023
Russell Findlay
Thank you.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2023
Russell Findlay
My final question is a much more overarching one, if that is okay, convener.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2023
Russell Findlay
Thank you. I do not know whether either of the other witnesses would like to come in on that, but I have another question if they do not.
Victim Support Scotland told us that it is inevitable that the more people who get bail, the more offences will be committed. We know that one in eight crimes are committed by those who are on bail and that 23 per cent of bail orders were breached, so it seems logical that the more people who are bailed, the more crime there will be, the more work there will be for the police, and, perhaps, the busier the courts will become. Without fixing the bigger issue of support and investment in criminal justice social work to stop reoffending, therefore, the bill might fuel bail, fuel crime and make things worse. Do you have any view on that?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2023
Russell Findlay
In perpetuity.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2023
Russell Findlay
It is about resources. We are told that the national care service is a work in progress, and the minister told us that it will be at least 2024 before we know whether criminal justice social work will be part of that. If bail is to be radically changed, whatever the outcome, it is almost certain that that will put greater pressure on criminal justice social work. You cannot speak for that sector, but can you foresee how it would possibly cope with the likely increase in work? That question is probably for Joanne and Stuart.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2023
Russell Findlay
Thank you. Feel free to come in, Stuart, if you would like to.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2023
Russell Findlay
There are two issues: managing people who have been bailed, and early release of prisoners who might need some form of monitoring as part of the conditions of their release. Is it the case that Police Scotland cannot, as the federation states, safely manage that cohort within current resourcing arrangements?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2023
Russell Findlay
Good morning. I have two questions. We have touched on some elements of them already. The first relates to part 1 of the bill and the grounds on which bail can be refused being narrowed to two particular criteria: one relates to the significant risk of prejudice to the interests of justice, and the other relates to the risk to public safety. We have heard, off the record, from prosecutors that there are concerns about the lack of a legal definition of “public safety”. There is a fear that, if that is not properly defined in the bill, it will cause problems with interpretation that will end up clogging up the Sheriff Appeal Court. Should there be a definition? If so, what might that look like?