The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1673 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2023
Russell Findlay
How were the Government’s views made known to the Prison Service?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2023
Russell Findlay
I am not entirely sure that we know how the Government communicated to the Prison Service its dissatisfaction with that prisoner being in the female estate. The partial review that we have in front of us does not explain that, so it is a perfectly reasonable question. Perhaps the Prison Service could tell us how the Government made its views known.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2023
Russell Findlay
What is your latest estimate of when the report might be published?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2023
Russell Findlay
Is it likely to be published this year?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2023
Russell Findlay
I put on the record that His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary in Scotland has just issued its terms of reference for a thematic review into policing mental health in Scotland, and it is due to publish that, according to its initial report, in July. Presumably, it is asking the same questions that we are asking, and it will perhaps have greater access to a lot of this stuff than we do. In the context of all this, that is vital.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2023
Russell Findlay
I have a small point that is worth putting on the record in relation to legislation elsewhere in the UK. The Prisoners (Disclosure of Information About Victims) Act 2022 was an act in England and Wales and has been put into use in specific cases.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2023
Russell Findlay
I have a quick question on paragraph 16, to which Jamie Greene and Rona Mackay both referred. There is perhaps a more fundamental issue about the creation of Police Scotland, which is coming up to its 10th birthday. The short history of both the SPA and Police Scotland has been tumultuous, to say the least. At the very beginning, there were serious questions about both the ability and the willingness of the SPA to hold Police Scotland sufficiently to account, and indeed, in the early days, about political meddling, which has now been pretty much acknowledged.
I go back to the specific issue. In May 2021, the committee raised the issue of officer suicides. In September 2021, we got a letter in which the SPA said that, based on the information that was available at the time, there was nothing to suggest that any of the recent cases was caused directly by the pressure of work.
The SPA took the information from Police Scotland—it took Police Scotland at its word. That response was disingenuous, to say the least because, in some of those cases, the officers had made known their difficulties with the on-going processes that they were being put through.
That one brief letter highlights the problem of the SPA showing a lack of curiosity, or robustness, in respect of holding Police Scotland to account and asking difficult questions about difficult subjects.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2023
Russell Findlay
I do not want to sound negative or as though I am always complaining, but we have asked these basic questions of witnesses in this committee. We have asked how many virtual trials have taken place, what the nature of the crimes were, and what the disposal rate was and how that compared to disposal rates in the non-virtual courts. However, it is only now that we are finally getting something like what we have been looking for and getting some data, and it is slightly underwhelming. It perhaps reveals what we suspected, which is that there is a kind of half-hearted attempt to do this.
It is worth bearing in mind that the SCTS could spend millions of pounds creating all the bespoke centres with all the best technology available, but if the judiciary and the defence lawyers do not like it, it will not happen. That is the very point that is being made in the paragraph that Jamie Greene identified at the outset. It may be that I am wrong; it may be that they are all for it and it is just that there have been technical difficulties. However, I think that it has probably been because of a reluctance on the part of the judiciary and defence lawyers and that, frankly, is where the power lies. I do not think that the SCTS can force anyone to embrace this.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2023
Russell Findlay
I will go back to the point that Jamie Greene made. I presume that the number of people who seek transcripts is not huge, so would it really have made a significant difference to the cost of the contract? It is maybe an academic question, but if we are writing to the Government anyway, and unpicking or asking for details about the tender, it is perhaps worth including questions of that nature.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2023
Russell Findlay
I would like to ask about the SPS review, which is a work in progress. The report was initially due to be published last summer, I think. This is a two-pronged question. Would there be any value in, or are you considering, publishing the report as a draft document initially, in order to give various bodies the chance to feed back and respond to it, or will it be published as a final work?
Secondly, given that the report has already been delayed, will it be delayed further until the new First Minister is in post? Will that have any bearing on it?