Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 17 May 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1673 contributions

|

Criminal Justice Committee

Transgender Prisoners and Scottish Prisons

Meeting date: 22 February 2023

Russell Findlay

How were the Government’s views made known to the Prison Service?

Criminal Justice Committee

Transgender Prisoners and Scottish Prisons

Meeting date: 22 February 2023

Russell Findlay

I am not entirely sure that we know how the Government communicated to the Prison Service its dissatisfaction with that prisoner being in the female estate. The partial review that we have in front of us does not explain that, so it is a perfectly reasonable question. Perhaps the Prison Service could tell us how the Government made its views known.

Criminal Justice Committee

Transgender Prisoners and Scottish Prisons

Meeting date: 22 February 2023

Russell Findlay

What is your latest estimate of when the report might be published?

Criminal Justice Committee

Transgender Prisoners and Scottish Prisons

Meeting date: 22 February 2023

Russell Findlay

Is it likely to be published this year?

Criminal Justice Committee

Policing and Mental Health

Meeting date: 22 February 2023

Russell Findlay

I put on the record that His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary in Scotland has just issued its terms of reference for a thematic review into policing mental health in Scotland, and it is due to publish that, according to its initial report, in July. Presumably, it is asking the same questions that we are asking, and it will perhaps have greater access to a lot of this stuff than we do. In the context of all this, that is vital.

Criminal Justice Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 22 February 2023

Russell Findlay

I have a small point that is worth putting on the record in relation to legislation elsewhere in the UK. The Prisoners (Disclosure of Information About Victims) Act 2022 was an act in England and Wales and has been put into use in specific cases.

Criminal Justice Committee

Policing and Mental Health

Meeting date: 22 February 2023

Russell Findlay

I have a quick question on paragraph 16, to which Jamie Greene and Rona Mackay both referred. There is perhaps a more fundamental issue about the creation of Police Scotland, which is coming up to its 10th birthday. The short history of both the SPA and Police Scotland has been tumultuous, to say the least. At the very beginning, there were serious questions about both the ability and the willingness of the SPA to hold Police Scotland sufficiently to account, and indeed, in the early days, about political meddling, which has now been pretty much acknowledged.

I go back to the specific issue. In May 2021, the committee raised the issue of officer suicides. In September 2021, we got a letter in which the SPA said that, based on the information that was available at the time, there was nothing to suggest that any of the recent cases was caused directly by the pressure of work.

The SPA took the information from Police Scotland—it took Police Scotland at its word. That response was disingenuous, to say the least because, in some of those cases, the officers had made known their difficulties with the on-going processes that they were being put through.

That one brief letter highlights the problem of the SPA showing a lack of curiosity, or robustness, in respect of holding Police Scotland to account and asking difficult questions about difficult subjects.

Criminal Justice Committee

Virtual Trials

Meeting date: 22 February 2023

Russell Findlay

I do not want to sound negative or as though I am always complaining, but we have asked these basic questions of witnesses in this committee. We have asked how many virtual trials have taken place, what the nature of the crimes were, and what the disposal rate was and how that compared to disposal rates in the non-virtual courts. However, it is only now that we are finally getting something like what we have been looking for and getting some data, and it is slightly underwhelming. It perhaps reveals what we suspected, which is that there is a kind of half-hearted attempt to do this.

It is worth bearing in mind that the SCTS could spend millions of pounds creating all the bespoke centres with all the best technology available, but if the judiciary and the defence lawyers do not like it, it will not happen. That is the very point that is being made in the paragraph that Jamie Greene identified at the outset. It may be that I am wrong; it may be that they are all for it and it is just that there have been technical difficulties. However, I think that it has probably been because of a reluctance on the part of the judiciary and defence lawyers and that, frankly, is where the power lies. I do not think that the SCTS can force anyone to embrace this.

Criminal Justice Committee

Access to Court Transcripts

Meeting date: 22 February 2023

Russell Findlay

I will go back to the point that Jamie Greene made. I presume that the number of people who seek transcripts is not huge, so would it really have made a significant difference to the cost of the contract? It is maybe an academic question, but if we are writing to the Government anyway, and unpicking or asking for details about the tender, it is perhaps worth including questions of that nature.

Criminal Justice Committee

Transgender Prisoners and Scottish Prisons

Meeting date: 22 February 2023

Russell Findlay

I would like to ask about the SPS review, which is a work in progress. The report was initially due to be published last summer, I think. This is a two-pronged question. Would there be any value in, or are you considering, publishing the report as a draft document initially, in order to give various bodies the chance to feed back and respond to it, or will it be published as a final work?

Secondly, given that the report has already been delayed, will it be delayed further until the new First Minister is in post? Will that have any bearing on it?