The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1251 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2021
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
I have a second—brief—question. You have said that there are 900 different data holders at the moment. Under the Caldicott guardian principles, the GP is responsible for the data, but if we move those data to the cloud and go the way that we want to go by giving lots of other people access to them, who will then be responsible? Surely it cannot be the GP.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2021
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
Everything that we are talking about sounds fantastic with regard to the data that GPs are holding and everyone being fully integrated and so on. However, the fact is that the GP systems—Vision and EMIS—do not talk to each other at the moment; there is no data integration between the two. I realise that I am straddling two themes with this question, but what can be done immediately to allow GPs to access data from another GP data source?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2021
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
On the point about data being poorly collected, NHS Lothian’s ethnicity recording went from 3 per cent to 90 per cent over three years. The point about linkage to the CHI number goes back to Emma Harper’s point about data collection fatigue when people are asked about ethnicity on multiple occasions. Surely the way to ensure that all ethnicity data is captured is to ask the question once and link the information to a person’s CHI, which goes through everything.
Once we capture ethnicity data, we must be absolutely sure that we can use that data, when someone presents, to work out symptoms and how we should manage and treat them. For example, a person of black descent with high blood pressure should be started on a calcium channel blocker rather than an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor. Ethnicity makes a huge difference to how we treat people.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 16 November 2021
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
In your first answer to me, you asked me to talk to people on the front line. Yesterday, I was a GP talking to patients and staff on the front line.
In 2017, we were promised 250 link workers by the end of the parliamentary session in 2021. That was backed by evidence given to this committee in 2019. As of a Scottish Government publication in October 2021, only 218 link workers are in post. Most concerningly, there are no link workers in Aberdeenshire, Forth Valley, Midlothian, north Highland and the Western Isles. Why are those five areas without link workers? We are all aware of the vital role that they play.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 16 November 2021
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
Hospital at home was first introduced in NHS Lanarkshire in 2011. It has had great results. In March 2020, Jeane Freeman announced £1 million of funding for the programme. Why, 10 years after hospital at home was first introduced and a year after £1 million was invested, do 10 health boards not have adequate hospital at home resources to prevent admissions?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 16 November 2021
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
The target has not been achieved since 2017. Through the amazing adaptations and digital appointments that have been offered through the Covid pandemic, there has been an increase to 82.7 per cent of people being seen within 18 weeks. Covid is not the reason why we are missing the target, so how could we improve access to psychological therapies and address the fact that we have not hit the HEAT target since 2017?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 16 November 2021
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
Good morning, minister. I declare an interest as a practising NHS doctor.
The health improvement, efficiency and governance, access and treatment—HEAT—target for starting psychological therapy is 18 weeks after referral. Psychological therapy is vital in dealing with patients who have mental health issues. When was the last time the HEAT target was achieved?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2021
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
When I was doing my GP shift yesterday, I had a conversation about DNACPR, whci stands for “do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation”. That is not one conversation; it is the start of a conversation that has to be gone back to on multiple occasions.
I visited the Prince and Princess of Wales Hospice, which is providing amazing care. It even has beds for young adults. Because that is an independent hospice, a patient who wants respite but whose funding is being controlled by the council is not able to access care at that hospice. They can only go to a hospice that is part of a big chain and they cannot access the amazing care that that hospice provides.
Would you be able to look at that, to stop that from happening and to allow even people whose councils control their respite funding to be able to choose where they go for respite care?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2021
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
My question is for Dr Thomson and Dr Buist. As we know, 85 per cent of all patient contact happens in primary care, and given that demand, there will be patients who will quite clearly be desperate to go to A and E instead. However, they might then be redirected from A and E back to their GPs. Is there a set of patients who are simply being passed between primary care and A and E, and if so, what can we do to stop that happening?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2021
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
Convener, I should just place on the record that, earlier, I was listening to the meeting online, so I was able to hear the minister.
