The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1844 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 March 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Does that apply specifically to women fleeing domestic violence?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 March 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Yes—in connection with the point that Gillian mentioned.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 March 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
You also talk in your submission about the need for strategic litigation, so that organisations could have standing in cases in the future. Will you tell us a bit more about that, particularly in relation to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (Incorporation) (Scotland) Bill?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 March 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
No, I am fine. I can come in right after you.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 March 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thanks, convener.
I am keen to explore—particularly with Jen Ang, given the focus of her work with Inclusion Scotland around disabled people—the area of access to legal services. In a 2021 survey on the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, 73 per cent of respondents said that deaf and disabled people find it
“hard to get support if they have a legal problem”,
and a quarter were not sure. Deaf and disabled people are more likely to say that they have experienced a civil law problem but there are still barriers to getting advice. Examples that were cited included
“Costs associated with reasonable adjustments ... not met by legal aid”—
I will come to Colin Lancaster on that point in a minute—as well as a
“lack of ... high quality BSL/English interpreters in courts and police stations”.
Another response highlighted that, often,
“we are exhausted daily so dealing with legal matters is mentally and physically impossible for many of us”.
How can we address some of that? Those are the same issues that I remember writing a report about when I worked on the independent living in Scotland project in 2015, so it feels as though we have not made much progress. I am excited to see the work that you guys are doing, but how do we tell more people about it, scale it up and resolve some of the issues for disabled people that I have just highlighted?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 March 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I suspect that it was both, if I am honest, given the lack of understanding on the part of the profession about what additional costs might be and what they can apply for. There is probably also an issue with regard to access to the services more generally. Perhaps Jim Stephenson from the Law Society might be able to comment on that.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 March 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Good morning. I thank everyone who has joined us for the information that they provided in advance, which has been really helpful, and for the supplementary information that they have given in their opening remarks. I had prepared some questions in advance, but a few more have arisen out of some of the comments—I guess that that is the nature of the discussion.
The first issue that I want to focus on is that of the areas in which people are seeking information. Fiona McPhail, I come to you first on housing, after which I will move on to debt. In your submission, you noted that women who experience domestic violence have specific issues; Jim Stephenson also mentioned that. What specific issues were you referring to in relation to access to justice? What can be done?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 March 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you. Convener, should I move on to the next area of questioning or will you go to someone else?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 March 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
It does. Thank you—I appreciate that.
You also made a point in your submission about unsuitable temporary homelessness accommodation and the recent inner house of the Court of Session judgment. Can you tell us about what that means for the people you work with and what we need to do to remedy that?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you.