The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1844 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 24 May 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
The inclusion fund that you mentioned earlier would be key to that.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 24 May 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
You have highlighted a number of areas in which you think the Turing scheme is left wanting and on which you think the Scottish Government should maybe move. If the system were to be developed in Scotland, what would the key aspects be, and what would be critical to making it work for your sector?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 24 May 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Would that fund be for people from underrepresented groups to use, or would it be used to meet some of the hidden costs? We have heard evidence from Colleges Scotland and others about the hidden costs of the scheme, such as double funding for staff to go over two different periods. Would that be part of the inclusion fund, or is that separate?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 24 May 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Susana, when did the Scottish Government last reach out to you?
10:15Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 17 May 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
The EIS has said that the stated cuts
“will make it more difficult for college lecturers to get a pay rise commensurate with that of their colleagues elsewhere in the public sector”.
How do you respond to that?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 17 May 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I do not think anything could be more real than 100 people in Glasgow, or 1,500 people across the country, possibly losing their jobs. Those are the figures according to correspondence that has been sent to the committee.
I have only been in this role for a short time, but there does not seem to be much direction for colleges or universities from the Government about its expectations. Can you set out when the Government will indicate its expectations to the Scottish Funding Council? Can you also set out your fair work expectations for colleges and universities?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 17 May 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
That is considerably regrettable. The Government has had 16 years to sort stuff like that out and we are in the situation that we are in. It will not be an acceptable answer to people who might lose their jobs.
My final question is short. How would you describe industrial relations in the sector, minister?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 17 May 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
In the higher and further education sector.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 17 May 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you. That brings me on nicely to what I was going to ask about.
On the issue of college boards, is it the Government’s intention to issue the good governance guidance at any point soon, and what is your view of having unions represented on boards?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 17 May 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you, convener, I will be very brief, because I will get an opportunity to ask further questions. Are you content that 100 jobs could be lost? I take the point that the losses are not a direct result of the £26 million cut, but the letter that we received from the college said that it was as a result of the sector’s budget cuts over several years. It is not fair to the people who are losing their jobs just to say that it is not because of the £26 million.
09:45