The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2169 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Have you had any intelligence about why there was a delay in the publication of the accounts of a couple of colleges? I think that you said that Audit Scotland was involved. Is there any other information that you can give us about that?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Do you think that, with the new responsibilities on top of those current responsibilities, the SFC will be able to scrutinise the sector’s financial sustainability to the level that is required?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
On the idea of Dundee being a one-off, the publication of the reports on the financial sustainability of colleges and universities has been delayed. They are normally due in January, so can you explain why the reports have been delayed and when they will be published?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
For my understanding, can I check whether the minister is suggesting engagement with the review group with a view to the Government lodging amendments at stage 3?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Does the minister recognise that student loans are used for income in other areas?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Do the minister and the Government recognise that the work that he has outlined still results in a less-than-strategic approach to the ratio of residential accommodation, affordable accommodation and cross-tenure accommodation to purpose-built student accommodation within each area, and that a strategy could bring some coherence to that?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
If they are recognised as income for other areas, why not for this one?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
For clarity, can I check whether the minister is, in principle, supportive of a charter and a strategy on purpose-built student accommodation?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
My question is similar to the one about timescales. What I am hearing in relation to a number of amendments is the need for consultation with the review group. I have to say that I share Ross Greer’s concern, if that is the right word—I do not want to put words in my colleague’s mouth—that we are not hearing that we should consult the review group on lodging stage 3 amendments that do the same thing, albeit with some specific changes. I again ask the minister whether the Government is prepared to lodge an amendment at stage 3 that looks to address the student loan income issue that we have been discussing.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I am not sure that I understand the minister’s logic. Why does he think that it would be difficult to regulate in that area? What does he think the problem would be for landlords to determine whether that source of income is equal to another one?