The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2169 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Sorry—I said that that was my last question, but I have a brief follow-up. Have any of your members described what they think the implications of that would be and what would need to happen for them to be able to do that?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
As opposed to other types of learning in higher education or in addition to those?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Do you think that the bill as drafted will increase the likelihood that more people will undertake apprenticeships?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Clare Reid, do you have any comments on those questions?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
If the bill were to be passed and all the funding were to go to the SFC, how big a priority would apprenticeships be within the scale of your work more widely? We have touched on that aspect already, but I would like to hear about it in the context of the 84,000 young people who are not in education, employment or training.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I want to move us on a little, to talk about financial sustainability and monitoring, on which the bill would introduce powers. I will start by setting the scene. Currently, about 84,000 young people in Scotland are not engaged in employment, education or training. More of them come from poorer areas than from other areas. Will the reforms that the bill proposes contribute meaningfully to addressing the immediate skills shortages that Scotland’s key sectors face?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you—I appreciate that.
I am sorry to do this, but it is important that we try to tease out this question. Damien, what are your views on that particular structure?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
My final question on this area is about the colleges. Colleges have said that they are concerned about some aspects of the current model for funding. In submissions on the bill, they have asked whether there will be a no-detriment principle in the way in which funding is distributed in the future. Are you considering that?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I thank Ross Greer for accepting my prompt to intervene and clarifying that. I understand and accept that point. Given that any other form of scrutiny of the plan is absent from the bill, his amendment 92 is useful.
I do not intend to move amendment 334, due to what my colleague Ross Greer said about other members of staff who are employed by the establishment. I did not intend to exclude them and would rather that the provision was far more inclusive. I am sure that he appreciates that.
However, I press amendment 331.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I am grateful to the cabinet secretary for taking my earlier intervention.
My amendment 317 would require the chief inspector to collaborate with Education Scotland in the exercise of their functions, which could help build a more coherent and collaborative education and learning system, as was called for by a range of stakeholders in the consultation on the bill. I take the cabinet secretary’s point about specificity and whether there is something on which to hang the duty, so, given the concerns about the specific mention of Education Scotland, I will not move amendment 317.
However, I still think that there needs to be coherence in the system and that the current lack of coherence should be addressed. That is why I think that my amendment 318 is really important, as it would require the chief inspector to work with relevant establishments and local authorities to
“support children, young people and their parents in those establishments”
with regard to inspections. We have already debated the purpose of inspections, and given that my position on that is on the record, I will not restate it, in the interests of time.
Amendment 318 is an important amendment. It would add to what the cabinet secretary is trying to do by suggesting that there should be collaboration, instead of simply indicating that the chief inspector must have regard to it.
I take the point about this statutory responsibility falling within the responsibility of local authorities—I agree that that is a fact. However, I am not sure that it precludes the chief inspector from working with local authorities and other bodies collaboratively to seek improvement. I am unconvinced that amendment 318 should not be tested in committee.