Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 15 October 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2169 contributions

|

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Tertiary Education and Training (Funding and Governance) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 7 May 2025

Pam Duncan-Glancy

You make an important point about the long-term sustainability of the sector.

This question is for Martin Boyle. The bill gives powers to the SFC to make recommendations, issue guidance and monitor the financial stability of the post-16 landscape. To what extent would that improve your ability to identify risk and could the proposals be further strengthened?

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Tertiary Education and Training (Funding and Governance) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 7 May 2025

Pam Duncan-Glancy

I am going to come to that.

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Tertiary Education and Training (Funding and Governance) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 7 May 2025

Pam Duncan-Glancy

From your perspective, Damien, is the bill the solution to the skills shortages that we have just now?

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Tertiary Education and Training (Funding and Governance) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 7 May 2025

Pam Duncan-Glancy

Regarding helping with the landscape, you mention that

“smaller, incremental changes such as alignment of approaches and processes could facilitate a smoother and more manageable reform process.”

Could you give us a bit more information about that?

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Tertiary Education and Training (Funding and Governance) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 7 May 2025

Pam Duncan-Glancy

My final question is on graduate apprenticeships. Do you think that there is anything in the bill that would help to increase the numbers of enrolments in graduate apprenticeships, or should anything be done in that regard outwith the bill?

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Tertiary Education and Training (Funding and Governance) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 7 May 2025

Pam Duncan-Glancy

Would anything in the bill need to change to make that happen?

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Tertiary Education and Training (Funding and Governance) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 7 May 2025

Pam Duncan-Glancy

I have a slightly different question, if that is okay. We have heard about various different models. What does the panel think the role of colleges is in all of this?

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Tertiary Education and Training (Funding and Governance) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 7 May 2025

Pam Duncan-Glancy

Okay. Thank you.

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Tertiary Education and Training (Funding and Governance) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 7 May 2025

Pam Duncan-Glancy

There obviously is significant interest in the financial sustainability of the sector, not least as part of what the bill might do, but also in general. I do not think that anyone can escape the concerns that have been raised around this.

Is there any indication that you could put at least some information in the public domain on the financial state of the sector, even though you might have been waiting for a couple of colleges to complete their accounts?

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Education (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 7 May 2025

Pam Duncan-Glancy

I still do not think that 40 days is enough, but I appreciate the clarification on recesses. It is incredibly important that we have 60 days—it could possibly be longer—because we need to have some time for scrutiny.

I do not see a particular form of parliamentary scrutiny set out in amendment 92, other than that the draft will be laid and members will be able to discuss it. My colleague Ross Greer might want to help me out on the intentions behind not adding a particular scrutiny process to the amendment.