Skip to main content

Language: English / Gàidhlig

Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 4 May 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1769 contributions

|

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Widening Access to Higher Education

Meeting date: 26 February 2025

Pam Duncan-Glancy

My final question is for you, Ms Scarlett. In 2019, the Government consulted on student support for disabled students. There was a recommendation for a forum to consider what needs to change and to drive forward the change that is needed. Has that forum been set up? If so, how is it doing? If not, should it be set up?

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Widening Access to Higher Education

Meeting date: 26 February 2025

Pam Duncan-Glancy

You are saying that the problem is about having 18 or 19 different data-sharing arrangements. It is really helpful to know that.

I have spoken with some of the organisations involved in the pilot, such as RGU and North East Scotland College, which are doing excellent work. They mentioned the idea of a unique student number, which is why I spoke about that as a mechanism that could make data sharing a little easier.

My next question is on student experience. Most of us round this table recognise that we must support people to get the best out of whichever institution they are at, whether that is school, college or university, or whether they are in employment. Since the widening access agenda took off, that issue has become more prevalent. Please set out some of the things that universities are doing to support their students. In doing so, I ask that you talk about that work in the context of your funding arrangement, which has not necessarily improved during the same period.

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Widening Access to Higher Education

Meeting date: 26 February 2025

Pam Duncan-Glancy

I have a final question to ask, if that is okay.

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Widening Access to Higher Education

Meeting date: 26 February 2025

Pam Duncan-Glancy

I have two quick questions. First, you mentioned the £15 million that was announced yesterday and you said that your understanding is that it will be for the University of Dundee. Is it your expectation that the Scottish Funding Council will use it for that purpose?

Education, Children and Young People Committee

“Higher History Review 2024”

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Pam Duncan-Glancy

Can you point to something in the bill that will change that from the start?

Education, Children and Young People Committee

“Higher History Review 2024”

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Pam Duncan-Glancy

I appreciate that, and it brings me to my final question. What will change if the bill is passed? You have spoken about the qualifications committee and a schools unit, but what will be different after the bill is passed and why should we, as parliamentarians, and the public have confidence that things will change?

Education, Children and Young People Committee

“Higher History Review 2024”

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Pam Duncan-Glancy

I want to ask specifically about the cabinet secretary’s direction. I understand a lot of the obligations that you have set out, and I am sure that there are many. Did you get any direction from the cabinet secretary in relation to the SATH survey?

Education, Children and Young People Committee

“Higher History Review 2024”

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Pam Duncan-Glancy

A number of the questions that I was going to ask were around culture, and they have already been covered.

I will take us back to 2020, when SATH said that similar circumstances had occurred. I understand that SATH has suggested that there were two exchanges—one email and one phone call—that made it clear that the SQA was displeased with the survey and that it could potentially lead to the SQA failing to support SATH in the future. That was in 2020, when a similar survey, I assume, resulted in similar circumstances. How did we end up here again, if a similar incident had already happened? What is different this time that will convince subject organisations that engagement with the body will be respectful and collaborative?

Education, Children and Young People Committee

“Higher History Review 2024”

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Pam Duncan-Glancy

I will pick up on the original response from Shirley Rogers about the people on the panel not necessarily being there in 2020. I accept that, I do, but it happened in 2020—I say “it”—and it seems that something similar is happening again. Short of saying, “Trust me,” which, as you said, will not do it, what will mean that we will not be back here in another couple of years?

In addition, what engagement have you had with the cabinet secretary and what has she asked of you in this regard?

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Pam Duncan-Glancy

I am content to consider them together, but I have a question about one of them. Is it okay to put that question now?