The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2001 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
There obviously is significant interest in the financial sustainability of the sector, not least as part of what the bill might do, but also in general. I do not think that anyone can escape the concerns that have been raised around this.
Is there any indication that you could put at least some information in the public domain on the financial state of the sector, even though you might have been waiting for a couple of colleges to complete their accounts?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
My amendment 309 would place an obligation on ministers to make regulations that specify the intervals at which establishments are to be inspected—the bill as currently drafted states that Scottish ministers “may” specify the intervals. That is incredibly important. As my colleague Stephen Kerr has set out on the record, it is important to continually understand what is happening in our schools and to get a regular picture of what is going on. It is not acceptable that ministers may not set out in regulation the intervals at which establishments should be inspected. That is why my amendment 309 would place an obligation on ministers to do so.
Amendment 312 would require ministers, before drafting such regulations, to consult teachers and
“people who ... represent the interests of ... teachers”.
That is important, because we have seen how inspections can lead to significant stress and concern for teachers and in establishments, which is one of the reasons why, in the debate on the previous group, I said that I was concerned about the Government’s amendment 84. It is crucial that we engage teachers so that they understand when and how often inspections will take place. The regulations must be laid and the sector should be engaged when the regulations are being drafted.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
My amendment 321 would place a duty on the chief inspector in the exercise of their functions to take account of
“the priorities of the Scottish Ministers in relation to education”
and of recommendations made by bodies, including committees of the Scottish Parliament, whose remit includes matters relating to education policy.
My amendment 322 would place a duty on the chief inspector in the exercise of their functions to have regard for people who use British Sign Language, have protected characteristics under the Equality Act 2010 or have additional support needs. Given the circumstances in schools for pupils with additional support needs and the extensive information that we heard in advance of stage 2 about the importance of BSL and people with other protected characteristics, amendment 322 sets out what I think are particularly important aspects that the chief inspector must have regard to when carrying out their functions.
Amendment 323 provides regulation-making powers for ministers to say who is included as a specified body, and amendment 358, which is consequential on that, confirms that any regulations will be made under the affirmative procedure.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I thank the cabinet secretary for that. However, there was a discussion in the chamber about recruiting to the board of qualifications Scotland, during which I said that I thought it unusual that we were being asked to vote to begin the recruitment process for qualifications Scotland. It is that point that I was referring to—
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I am happy to.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Regarding helping with the landscape, you mention that
“smaller, incremental changes such as alignment of approaches and processes could facilitate a smoother and more manageable reform process.”
Could you give us a bit more information about that?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
My final question is on graduate apprenticeships. Do you think that there is anything in the bill that would help to increase the numbers of enrolments in graduate apprenticeships, or should anything be done in that regard outwith the bill?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Would anything in the bill need to change to make that happen?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
For my understanding, can I check whether the minister is suggesting engagement with the review group with a view to the Government lodging amendments at stage 3?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Does the minister recognise that student loans are used for income in other areas?