The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2001 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 May 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Good afternoon, panel. Thank you for joining us and for providing submissions in advance.
I want to ask, first, about the international evidence. Naomi McAuliffe, will you say a little bit about your understanding of the international evidence of potential positive or negative impacts of self-ID in countries that have brought it in?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 May 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I have a final question on that. We heard earlier that some women are opting out of attending single-sex spaces and services for women such as rape crisis centres. Are you aware of that? If so, what is your response?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 May 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
That is helpful. I have one further question on border issues, if that is okay, convener.
In your submissions, you talk about the importance of ensuring that refugees and asylum seekers can access the process. Do we need to change the bill to make sure that that is the case? Could the Government provide further clarity and guidance on that if the committee asked for it?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 May 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Have any other countries done it well or badly? Are there any examples that you could use to say, “Do it like this, not like that”?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 May 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I thank the witnesses for their contributions so far.
I have a small supplementary on what was said earlier about the decoupling of law and diagnosis and medical treatment. In particular, Lucy Hunter Blackburn said that in Denmark people were moving to self-declaration for medical treatment. What is the system of medical care in that country in comparison to here? I cannot imagine a situation here in which someone could approach a medical professional and ask them to do something, and they would just do it.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 May 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
The bill does not erase gender dysphoria but just takes out the process—
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 May 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
It is a follow-up question in relation to 16 and 17-year-olds.
Some panellists, including yourselves, have concerns around the lack of capacity assessment in the bill for 16 and 17-year-olds. Would you support an amendment to the bill that would create an assumption that all 16 and 17-year-olds have capacity to understand the process and its legal implications, as is the case in other law in Scotland, unless in specific circumstances an assessment would find that not to be the case?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 May 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
It has been quite the session, and I appreciate the length of time that the witnesses have been here. It has been broad ranging.
I am concerned about a number of the things that you have raised—particularly, Dr Coleman, the experiences that you have shared about what has happened in prisons. However, I am interested to note that those have happened within the current gender recognition certificate process and that people have still been able to be bad actors within that system—which is, of course, unacceptable.
I also note that we have heard a lot about puberty blockers and data on healthcare. I share my colleague Rachael Hamilton’s concerns on data in healthcare—in all healthcare; if we were a nation that properly delivered healthcare on the basis of data, we would all be in a very different circumstance. There is a lot to do on that.
However, I struggle a wee bit to see how that relates directly to the bill that is in front of us. Lucy Hunter Blackburn, I come back to the point that you made earlier, which was excellently put: we have to focus on the bill that is in front of us. The examples in prisons and the examples of puberty blockers are part of a discussion but are probably not directly related to the bill in front of us. I therefore want to move on to talk about bits of the bill itself.
My first question is on the time period. Lucy, you have suggested that there is perhaps a way to change to a single six-month period from application to issue, and that that could help with data collection. I am keen to hear how.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 May 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I understand that, but I am trying to get to the point where we can do our job as legislators, which is to make sure that the bill is the best possible piece of legislation that it can be to provide trans people with validation, destigmatisation and so on, as you said earlier. Therefore, we need to be really specific. At what point, now, do gender recognition certificates come in? Do people have to provide them in order to use toilets, changing rooms and single-sex spaces?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 May 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Okay—