The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2015 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Is there a regional or structural model that you think could be developed that would support the people you represent, colleges in the sector as well, to the ends of getting young people into jobs?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Sai, you said that you have observer status on the SFC. How should that proceed going forward?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Is there a supply problem? Is there a lack of students from colleges who are, for example, prepared to take on the responsibility because they are busy doing other things, or is it a structural question of recruitment?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Does any of that change if the management agent is a college?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I was going to say good morning, but it is the afternoon.
Thank you for your honesty, but also for the depth in which you have engaged with this because it is important. Before I ask my main question, if it is all right, I want to come back to Stephanie Lowe’s earlier point about the statistic that I quoted last week. That is what I think should drive us, and I think that your industry and our intentions to improve the life chances of young people across Scotland are aligned on that. What would you do, specifically, to make it easier for your industry to deliver for those 84,000 young people?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
That is coming across strongly.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
You have said that there should be a seat on the board. Should there also be committee structures for particular sectors?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Amendment 318 says that the chief inspector would “coordinate the support provided” instead of delivering the change. Once schools get their inspection reports, which, at the minute, are one word long—or, at least, are fairly short—they can be left without much support or advice on how to improve, and my amendment aims to add to the inspectorate’s work the function of trying to help schools collaborate with others to get as much information and support as they might need in order to make the improvements that the inspection report suggests that they need to make. If members support that principle, I would be prepared to bring the issue back at stage 3, but that is the intention behind the amendment. I would hope that I could get some support for giving the inspectorate that type of collaborative, supportive function at stage 3.
20:00I will not be moving my amendment 350, for the reasons that the cabinet secretary and Ross Greer have highlighted with regard to Education Scotland being named specifically. Again, however, I would note that I lodged my amendments in this group, because I felt that it was important for us to understand that the system needs to be coherent and that all the parts need to work together. Teachers on the front line and people who work in schools need to feel closer to the decisions around the improvement function in respect of how they can improve the delivery of education to the young people in their establishments. That is what these amendments were intended to do.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
The text of amendment 318 is that
“The Chief Inspector may work with relevant educational establishments and local authorities to coordinate the support provided to children, young people and their parents in those establishments.”
That is quite clear, and I think that it takes us a step further than the wording in amendment 87, which is that the chief inspector should
“have regard to the desirability of”
collaborative working, because it is a little bit more directive.
Amendment 318 also says that
“The Chief Inspector may prepare and publish guidance on the exercise”
of their functions under this section of the bill. I think that there is scope to provide the flexibility that is needed, as well as to ask or expect the chief inspector to support education authorities and others in the sector as part of their function, which is to improve schools.