The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2169 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 17 November 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Do you think that the bill needs to be strengthened in that sense?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 17 November 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Forgive me, but the Scottish ministers are accountable for what they direct local government to do, the money that they put into local government and the work that they do in social care, so I do not think that it is fair to characterise the situation as one in which the minister has no responsibility.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 17 November 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I do not have another question, convener. I was just hoping that Andrew Ewen might come in on the previous one.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 November 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I thank the cabinet secretary for her response and for the helpful conversations that we have had about my amendments in the group. I press amendment 121.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 November 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I have lodged amendment 115 because I do not think that it is fair to exclude asylum seekers from the process. My amendment explicitly adds them to the bill, and I encourage members to vote for it for that reason.
I move amendment 115.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 November 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you, cabinet secretary. I appreciate that.
I am tempted to press the amendment, because I want to put on the record the strength of feeling that there is to include asylum seekers in the bill. I would welcome further discussions at stage 3 if the issue is not addressed in the committee today.
I press amendment 115.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 November 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I thank the cabinet secretary for setting out her position on the record. I am satisfied with the way that she has described what she is trying to do. I was seeking to make the provision not narrower, but broader, but I understand the cabinet secretary’s rationale, so I will not press amendment 126 and I will vote for her amendments.
Amendment 126, by agreement, withdrawn.
12:00Amendment 127 moved—[Russell Findlay]
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 November 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I thank Maggie Chapman for her comments on my amendments in the group.
Unfortunately, I will not be able to support amendment 97, because I believe that narrowing the list of persons with an interest could prevent someone who has a genuine interest in someone’s GRC application from using the person of interest provisions in good faith, on the grounds of genuine concerns about capacity. However, my amendments 130 and 132—as Maggie Chapman suggested—attempt to add safeguards and proportionality to the process to prevent people from using it maliciously. For that reason, I ask members to support my amendments. I think that Maggie Chapman’s amendments 95 and 96, which she has said that she will withdraw and not move respectively, are reasonable but I ask members to support my amendments.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 November 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you—give me a second to get to the correct page in my notes.
The intention behind amendment 126 is to ensure that someone who is nearing the end of their life does not have to wait unnecessarily to have their gender recognised in legislation. I lodged the amendment because I think that the reflection period should be waived for people in that situation.
I recognise that the Government has lodged amendment 49 on the matter and I welcome its agreement to work on it before stage 3.
In amendment 126, I use the definition of “terminally ill” that is used in social security legislation in Scotland, which I think is a good definition. I do not intend to press amendment 126, but I would welcome the Government agreeing to work with us to ensure that someone who is at the end of their life can get a gender recognition certificate as quickly as possible and to consider using the definition from social security legislation.
I move amendment 126.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 November 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I thank the cabinet secretary for her answers, and I note some of the concerns about competency in relation to amendment 115. However, I believe that we need to send a signal that asylum seekers are welcome to apply for the process. I wonder, therefore, whether the cabinet secretary will consider the requirement in Tess White’s amendment 116 that the applicant intends to be here for longer than a year. Most asylum seekers, I imagine, would make that declaration and believe it to be true at the time. On that basis, will the cabinet secretary consider supporting that amendment?
