The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2383 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you, convener, and apologies for the earlier preview of this question. I will repeat it, because we have moved on slightly. Volunteer Scotland, which gave evidence last week, told us:
“we will not know the true impact of this legislation on charities, and their trustees, until it is clear how OSCR intend to communicate and implement the new measures. This is not clarified within the detail of the Bill.”
Further, the SCVO said that the administration and communications budget may be significant.
My question is for Martin Tyson. How are you preparing for the bill? Will you be able to do that within existing budgets, and how will you communicate the changes?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
What kind of process do you imagine would be in place to waive or challenge that decision?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Where would the administrative burden of proof fall?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
A couple of questions have come up from the answers that we have been given. John Maton made a point about discretionary versus automatic disqualification. Will you explain that a bit and say what we would need to do here to apply discretionary disqualification instead of automatic disqualification?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
We heard some evidence about that from the sector last week. I think that those who gave that evidence would concur with that.
Does Keith Macpherson have anything to add?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Do you think that a further review is needed? If so, what should it include? I see that John Picton is nodding. We will note that.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you. I think that there will be further questions from my colleagues on that particular point.
To stick with the theme of the review and what is in the bill, I think that John Picton said in his written submission that, in order to bring the bill in line with UK regulation, there would need to be a bit more on that. Does he feel that that came out in the consultation? Given his comment about bringing the bill into line with other parts of the UK, are there areas that should be part of the proposal or part of a broader review?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you. That is much appreciated.
Gavin McEwan, this is my final question on the theme. Your written submission says that the law could go further. Notwithstanding your comment about reorganisation, which we have noted, have any other issues come out through the consultation that should be part of what is now proposed, as opposed to being part of a review in the future?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Good morning, panel, and thank you for engaging with the committee on the bill so far. I have a couple of questions about the consultation that led to the review of the proposals that are before us. I will start with Martin Tyson, if that is all right.
What is your view of the consultation to date? I refer to the one that was done in 2019 and then repeated. Are there any areas of regulation that have not been covered as part of the review and the bill?