The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1769 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 31 March 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
That is much appreciated. Thank you, convener.
I thank the minister for that answer. I appreciate and understand the mechanisms in the 2018 act that are available to him. I was concerned more about the sudden change, which took place in a matter of days.
Moving on to the uprating that does not relate to inflation, minister, will you explain why there is no uprating at all to the carers allowance supplement? You said in your opening statement that you will do something about that in the future. When will that be? I am sure that that will be very helpful for unpaid carers.
I also ask what the Government intends to do for the 150,000 children who are on bridging payments and the 177,000 children who are getting no Scottish child payment at all just now because the roll-out has not happened. Will you explain to the committee and others what the Government will do for them before December this year?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 31 March 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Would it be okay to consider the uprating of the Scottish child payment and other benefits not related to inflation now, or do you want me to wait until after Marie McNair has come in, when I can come back in on theme 2? Which would you prefer?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 31 March 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I have no further questions, convener.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 31 March 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you, and good morning, convener. Thank you, minister, for joining us this morning and for setting things out. Thanks to the officials, too.
First, although Scottish Labour will vote for the measures—because not doing so would mean no increase for anyone—I again put on record my disappointment that we are not doing anything to uprate disability and carers’ benefits. People with disabilities and carers are facing cost of living pressures, too, and we should be using all the powers of the Parliament to address that.
Last week, the Institute for Fiscal Studies told the committee that the uprating by 6 per cent was well meaning but badly designed, and I have to say that I agree. It all feels very ad hoc, and I do not believe that that is the way to manage public funds. One Scottish statutory instrument said that some things will be uprated that would not be uprated at all. Then, literally overnight, that was removed. On the Monday, the Government still thought that 3.1 per cent was fine. On the Wednesday, it thought better of that and came to the right decision to uprate by 6 per cent. In addition, some benefits are being uprated by amounts that do not align with inflation. It feels as though the measures are very much grace and favour, but families cannot reflect that.
Will the minister commit to automatically uprating Scottish benefits in line with inflation in the coming years? Will the Government commit to uprating the adult disability payment and child disability payment in line with the rest of the benefits when the transfer process is complete?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 31 March 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you for that. Can you also set out what support would be in place for kinship carers and children in kinship care ahead of the roll-out of the £25 child payment in December? In particular, what can you say about the 150,000 children on bridging payments who will not get the increased amount?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 31 March 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you for outlining the measures that the Government is taking, but I specifically asked about measures that you are not taking and what you will do about the 150,000 children who are getting bridging payments and who will not get the £20—the doubling of the Scottish child payment—in April. They will not get any increase until December this year. There are 177,000 children—[Inaudible.]—either, because of the claimant uptake. What can you do specifically for those children?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 31 March 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
If the minister is unable to say anything further at this time, I would be happy to hear about that in writing.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 31 March 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you, minister, for outlining the position and for your answers so far.
Do you intend that the national allowance will be uprated in line with the cost of living and inflation in the same way that benefits have been?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 March 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you, convener; I will be very brief.
Minister, on the basis of the UNCRPD report that Inclusion Scotland published last week, do you believe that we will meet the target of halving the disability employment gap by 2038 and, if so, how? Could we get a short update on the progress of the disability employment plan?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 March 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
As the minister will be aware, equalities groups have written a letter about the Covid-19 inquiry. Specifically, they have said that the inquiry’s remit makes no mention of
“women, Black and minority ethnic communities, disabled people, LGBT+ People, older people, young people, persons subject to No Recourse to Public Funds, and other groups who ... have experienced”
the brunt of the pandemic. Those organisations feel let down, as I am sure that the minister will know. They have recently said that there was absolutely no evidence that they were “listened to”, and that the door was closed in their faces. I hope that that was not the intention—I am sure that it was not.
In addition, the Government and Lady Poole have suggested that the treatment of refugees and asylum seekers will not be included in the Covid-19 inquiry, as that remains a reserved matter. I have a few questions on those areas.
On my latter point, does the minister accept that local authorities and national health service health boards play a significant role in the treatment of those groups? Would she therefore agree that the treatment of refugees and asylum seekers should be included in the inquiry?
Going back to the issues that equalities groups raised, and the work that the committee has done on women’s unfair responsibility for unpaid work, what more could the Government do to ensure that those voices are heard in the inquiry? What actions can the Government take to address the issue of unfair responsibility for unpaid work? Further to that, what more could you do, and what do you intend to do, to implement a choice of split payments for universal credit, which could specifically support women in such situations?