The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2169 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 15 December 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
It is clear that none of the payments described this morning has addressed the real fuel insecurity and poverty that people across Scotland are experiencing. I was also going to mention the child winter heating payment issue that my colleague Jeremy Balfour mentioned. A number of disabled people, regardless of their age or level of impairment, are having to use more heating now than before, so they are disproportionately impacted by this. The reality is that, from what we have heard in this committee and from what people have told us in our constituencies, they do not have enough money to get by and none of what we are doing in Scotland is getting there. It is like a finger in a dam, as we have been told. Can you commit to reviewing that landscape, very quickly, and to starting to address the fuel poverty that people in Scotland are going to experience?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
That was really clear. Thank you.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you. That was really clear.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Good morning, witnesses, and thank you very much for everything that you have shared. Thanks to Richy Edwards, in particular. Your testimony was much appreciated. I can imagine that it must have been very difficult to share that, especially since you have had to do so time and time again, so thank you.
I will pick up on part of the discussion that we just had, and then I have another couple of questions. We have already discussed the importance of education after the bill is introduced. That will be an absolutely essential non-legislative measure, but we also need to reach into various communities before the bill is introduced, given the context—which some of you have mentioned—of LGBT people’s rights and the pushback that there is. I hope that there is room to do that, so that we can try our best to take people with us. Do you agree that that is quite important?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Do you mean that people report crimes to the police but they do not get support to use Makaton or to express themselves so their cases never reach court because they do not quite reach the bar for the amount of evidence that is needed?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Dr Behrens made a point about gender identity. The United Kingdom Government has made some comments about a ban on conversion practices covering only sexual orientation, not gender identity, saying that such a move would be too complicated at this time. What is your view on that statement?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
The question that I was going to ask before I heard some of the conversation was whether, in your view, the Scottish Government has the power under devolved legislation to deliver the full and comprehensive ban that is needed.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you, Sandra, for everything that you said. I was not aware of the detail of the history of Makaton that you shared, which was fascinating. I was aware of what it is, but I did not understand its history. Thank you for telling us about that and for answering our questions.
David, your point about justice really got to the heart of what this is about, which is justice for disabled people, as you both described. Many of those who are in the circumstances that you described are people with learning disabilities.
Sandra, you made a point about the need for the person to connect with the interpreter. Are you aware of any situation where somebody who already has a connection with the person who uses Makaton—a member of their family or friendship group, or a person who provides interpretation in another context, for example—has been allowed to support them in a legal situation? If so, has that carried any weight?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Have you heard of anyone who got support before a case went to court?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 8 December 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Good morning, Mark and Frazer, and thank you for your advance submissions and your answers to our questions so far.
Some of the questions that I had have already been answered, so, in the interests of time, I will not repeat them. I will start with a question for Mark, if that is okay.
SCOSS’s report says that breaking the link with cold weather is retrogressive in terms of human rights. Can you explain that a bit more? As far as I can tell, the Scottish Government’s answer to that seems to be that the unreliability of cold weather is difficult for low-income families and that a predictable one-off payment is better. How do you respond to that point, given the comments about human rights?
