The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2383 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 25 April 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I appreciate the slightly more optimistic outlook, if we can call it that. I am sure that colleagues round the table will do what we can to push that forward. Thank you again to the panel.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 25 April 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I am not even sure how to follow that—thank you. I thought that it was grim earlier. That was pretty concise.
We had a briefing earlier from a representative of the Children and Young People’s Commissioner, who said that it is really important that we in Scotland do everything that we can in human rights terms. How important is it, given the Illegal Migration Bill and, I am sure, for other reasons, that the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (Incorporation) (Scotland) Bill is brought back to this Parliament and enacted as soon as possible? I will ask Andy Sirel again, because he mentioned children’s rights earlier.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you. Convener, can I go on to my next question, which is on the retention of staff, or do you want to bring in other members who might have questions on fees?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I appreciate that answer. The Law Society said that, as a result of that inequality, in the region of tens of thousands of people are missing out on access to justice. If I am honest, I am not sure that going 15 or 20 minutes down the road is exactly what people are looking for. The fact that people in our poorest areas are sharing a very small number of legal aid firms between them probably suggests that there is a bigger problem, and that is borne out by the number of people who are not accessing justice. I hope that something can be done about that through the reviews.
I have a final very quick question. There are a number of issues relating to thresholds for legal aid. It is considered that there might be quite a bit of unmet need, as many people do not qualify for legal aid. Is the Government collecting figures on that?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you, minister—and your officials—for joining us this morning. I will take the question of fees a little further. I am sure that the minister has seen the letter from the Law Society, which says:
“It is simply not palatable to wait this length of time for a mechanism to review fees”.
I take the point about the amount of information that is required to set the starting point, but my understanding was that the review happened a number of years ago, so why we are still where we are now? Minister, are you in a position to say whether there will be any review of the fees in the interim period? If not, will you at least review the impact of the regulations within the next 12 months?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
The minister has just brought up the issue of retention, which is really key. Indeed, in the evidence session that we held with a number of organisations on access to justice, we heard that the availability of legal aid solicitors was a huge problem. I just want to get the figures right: the organisations talked, specifically, about huge inequalities in the availability of solicitors and said that, in the 139 poorest areas, there are only 29 legal aid firms—it is either 22 or 29; I will check in a second. In any case, there is only a handful of firms in those areas compared with others.
In view of that, and setting it against the fact that the fees do not appear in any way commensurate with the sort of costs that are involved and that, as a result of the current structure, solicitors who have been working in legal aid are now moving into other areas of law, can the minister set out how the instrument is going to change any of that? If it is not going to do that, what will?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 March 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Good morning to you and the officials who are joining you, cabinet secretary.
Two weeks ago, we heard from a third sector organisation that
“The proposals that have been consulted on were developed at the very beginning by OSCR and the Scottish Government without input from the SCVO or the”
third
“sector, so the process has very much been focused on proposals favoured by the regulator. I think that that speaks to the increasing calls for a wider review”.—[Official Report, Social Justice and Social Security Committee, 2 March 2023; c 2.]
What is the cabinet secretary’s response to that quote from an organisation in the sector?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 March 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Finally on the review, how do you intend to involve smaller charities?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 March 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
On that basis, would the cabinet secretary be prepared to consider further legislation if that were the outcome of such a review?