The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2001 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 29 September 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
In reaching the decision that you have come to on the use of buses, did you look at usage during the Covid pandemic, and did you look at comparable years before that? It strikes me—I am sure that you will appreciate this with your Covid recovery hat on—that disabled people and older people have been more reticent about going back to using buses. I would be worried if the amount was based on only very recent patronage.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 29 September 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
[Inaudible.]—Deputy First Minister, the question. I would love to debate those issues with you at length, but we do not have enough time to go into them. My questions were about how you made the decisions in the budget that you currently control. I would really appreciate reassurance on the record, because a number of organisations are looking for that.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 29 September 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Those organisations would offer and have offered alternatives, so I would not characterise that as complaining; rather, it is a plea to be involved in the process. Witnesses last week and before have told us that the process was opaque and untransparent, and that they were not able to get involved in it. They want the reassurance that they will have a meaningful conversation with you about the budget.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 29 September 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you both for the evidence that you have given so far and for your submissions.
Most of my questions on the cost of living have already been covered, with the exception of one. How have not only your membership but your organisations been affected by the cost of living crisis?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 29 September 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Sorry, convener—perhaps we could start with Graham O’Neill.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 29 September 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Good morning. Thank you for your submissions and your answers so far.
My first question is for Frank McKillop. In a similar vein to my colleague Natalie Don, I wonder whether you can set out some of the realities of what disabled people are having to do in the cost of living crisis, particularly in relation to fuel poverty. How is it affecting what they do on a daily basis?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 29 September 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Sure. I will move on to the spending priorities.
Employability has already been mentioned—I think that Frank McKillop raised that issue. Frank, are you aware of any impact that the employability cuts will have on the employability services that you deliver?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 29 September 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you. That is really helpful and clear.
I have a similar question about spending priorities for Gordon MacRae. In your submission, you highlighted that there has been a 17 per cent rise in children’s homelessness. That is tragic. You also noted that the flat cash settlement is setting councils up to fail. Do you have concerns about any of the priorities in the recent DFM cuts or the flat cash settlements in relation to the “Tackling Child Poverty Delivery Plan 2022-26”, particularly in housing?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 29 September 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I have one further question in that area. You have set out that there is already a process for you to engage with such organisations. However, last week, the committee heard from the Scottish Human Rights Commission that it
“was not a brilliant process”.—[Official Report, Social Justice and Social Security Committee, 22 September 2022; c 7.]
That is where my concerns lie. On a good day, we rely on processes being really good. On a difficult day—I am sure that the decisions that you were taking were difficult—if a process is not quite up to scratch, that makes it all the worse.
Given that, and given what we also heard about the third sector’s concerns—for example, about the ability of the no one left behind approach to have dealt with capacity in the first place—what could you do between now and bringing in the emergency budget to reassure such organisations that you will take account of the issues and needs of the people they represent?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 29 September 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I do, and I can run it on if that is helpful.
Mr Swinney, I hear you say that the current level of service will continue but there will not be as big an increase in the budget. That worries me, because the current level of service still delivers high numbers of unemployed disabled people in Scotland. Therefore, putting in the money in the first place would have been helpful and taking it out now will have serious consequences. The SHRC said last week that doing so removes a poverty prevention method, so I worry about the impact of this on disabled people’s poverty.
Have you considered that? Will you consider it in the emergency budget review? Do you have any indication of the impact that it might have on the Scottish Government’s targets to close the disability employment gap?