The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2001 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 27 October 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Good morning to the minister and his officials. I will start on a point of agreement: I completely share the minister’s belief that the UK Government has not done enough to support people during the cost of living crisis.
I am interested in the promotion of education maintenance allowance as a follow-on benefit to the Scottish child payment. I know that it has been touched on already, but can the minister set out what the Government is doing to make that process as automated as it could be—or, indeed, automated entirely?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 27 October 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Although we, in the Scottish Labour Party, obviously welcome the Scottish child payment and the additional money that is being allocated to it—the £5 per week top-up—we share some concerns about the delays to its full roll-out, not just as a result of some of the acute issues that we may see over the next few months with the uptick in applications, but because of the number of years that it has taken for over-sixes to access the payment. I understand that the minister—
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 27 October 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Are there plans to combine the delivery?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 27 October 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Convener, if I combine it with one of the questions that I have on the other theme to be quicker, can I ask a follow-up question? It is a good example of what I was going to ask.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 27 October 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I thank the minister for the answer, but that sounds quite a bit like there is still a reliance on the individual to apply. Is there a reason—that I am not aware of—why there could not be an automatic follow-on?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
My apologies, but I need to go because I have another meeting just now. I am sorry, but I am sure that I will hear the feedback.
12:45Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I thank everybody for their contributions so far and for what they have given us in advance, too. The submissions have been really helpful, as always.
First of all, I have a question about the issue of participation, which we have just discussed. Given some of the barriers that we have heard about, how would you characterise your involvement in the budget and the resource spending review? Could Susan McKellar, Allan Faulds, Oonagh Brown and Clare Gallagher answer that briefly?
I know that that is a lot of answerers, but you could be really brief. I am just trying to get a sense of how engaged you guys have been in the budget process or how open it has been to you.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
That was really helpful. I asked the question, because we heard earlier on about the importance of transparency. Obviously, we have already discussed that issue, but I just wanted to get a feel for where we are at so that the committee can understand the scale of the challenge.
My next question is in the same vein and is about minimum core rights and progressive realisation and what we need to measure in that respect. I know that those are big questions, and we have heard a lot about them this morning. I note that Audit Scotland’s submission highlights a gap between the rights that the Government encourages—or the rights that it says that people have or that it wants people to have—and the reality and that Susan McKellar’s submission talks about women being overlooked. Moreover, evidence from others including the Scottish Commission for People with Learning Disabilities—and, indeed, the letter to the British Institute of Human Rights in 2016—have highlighted some of the problems that we have.
We can look at the budget line for, say, social care and say that there might be more money going into that or into social security. However, we heard this morning from people with learning disabilities who are not even able to choose whom they live with. You can argue that the budget going up represents progressive realisation, but the lived reality does not even represent much of a minimum core, I would say. What do we need to measure and what framework can we use to help us get to a point where we can develop a minimum core and then ask sensible questions about the budget?
I throw that question open to anyone who feels that they want to give it a go.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I know—I am sorry.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
That is sensible.