The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1769 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you—and welcome back.
My question was about people’s ability to borrow after they have been through the bankruptcy process, particularly for things like mobile phones or broadband—which I guess is not so much about being able to borrow as about being able to get credit. I think that you said that that issue did not specifically relate only to bankruptcy, and then you mentioned credit reference agencies. That is as much as I got.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Do you collect figures as to how much money you get from the total fees paid to you?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Forgive me if my next question is slightly outwith your remit. As you say, when people become bankrupt, it is a fresh start and I can understand why it is a helpful option, but it can often result in people being unable to get further borrowing. I am not suggesting that people should then get into a cycle of borrowing, but even things such as getting a mobile phone or broadband contract can be difficult, and those are pretty essential. We have heard about that issue from a lot of witnesses. Do you have any views on what we could do about that or how we could improve that situation for people?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I want to follow up on the breathing space concept. Earlier, you mentioned the scheme down south and said that although there were things that we should look to in it, there were also things that you had questions about. What questions do you still have? Could something similar could work here?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Good morning—I had to look at the clock to check that it was still morning; it is indeed. Thank you very much for setting out what is a complex situation. I have been trying to get to grips with the information that you provided in advance. Forgive me if some of what I ask about is outwith your remit, or if I have misunderstood.
My first question is a simple one; it is about the 38,000 people in Scotland who are on DLA and have yet to transfer to PIP. Is it your understanding that leaving them to transfer to PIP, as opposed to ADP, would have taken longer than the process that is set out in the regulations?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 24 May 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I just want to follow up one of Bruce Adamson’s responses, if that is okay.
Bruce, you talked about the need to balance the rights to protection and to participation and autonomy. Can you tell us a bit more about how we ensure that the bill achieves that? Could amendments be made to the process for statutory declarations to balance participation and protection appropriately? Will you talk a bit about the presumption under the convention that children have capacity with regard to the courts when they reach the age of 16? That is the kind of early assumption that has been made. Should that approach be applied here? How could we address the bill’s differences from other legislation?
10:45Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 24 May 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Yes.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 24 May 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
What is your understanding of what that difference is?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 24 May 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Could I ask a further follow-up question?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 24 May 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
It is about section 195 of the Equality Act 2010, which both of you have mentioned. Do you think that the bill will have an impact on that section?