The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2169 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Do Danny Boyle and Farah Farzana want to add anything to that?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
The plan is due this year.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
My original question has been answered, but I have a brief follow-up on what Danny Boyle just said. Are you aware of the panel process having already started, or is that something that you have not been involved in?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you for that. I am probably going to go back a bit, if that is okay. I probably did not put my hand up in enough time to ask the question at the right moment.
We have just heard from Pervin Ahmad about the importance of a relational approach. I worry about race relations, which kind of takes me back to when we started discussing the Equality Act 2010. It feels like quite an old statement to make, but I am worried that race relations could be getting worse. I noted Pinar Aksu’s comments on people being placed in hotels rather than in ordinary community situations, and I have a couple questions about that.
I have been worried about what that means, particularly in Glasgow, but I am also worried about where the people who are on MS Ambition will go when it closes at the end of March. Have you noticed any impact on race relations in the city and across Scotland as a result not only of the more hostile environment but of the way that we have been putting people into unusual accommodation circumstances, as we might call them?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I thank the witnesses very much for the evidence that they have given us this morning and for the work that they have been doing. The point has just been made that the reality for organisations working in this field is really difficult right now. This committee and other committees have heard how hard it is for the third sector. I hope that something can be done about that and that the Government is cognisant of that, particularly when it comes to budgets.
A couple of my questions have been answered, particularly on the employment gap growing, especially for women.
In relation to the race equality, employment and skills framework, the then Minister for Business, Fair Work and Skills said:
“We need to ensure that leaders of public authorities have a strong understanding of what”
racism
“is and how that understanding can be applied to dismantle the barriers that create race inequality in the workplace.”
Do we have that understanding? Do you think that institutional racism is recognised and named in Scotland’s public authorities?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Do you think that institutional racism is recognised and named in public authorities?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Am I right in saying that, if we are seeking to progress that work, we should look at what actions are being taken and follow where money has gone to try to see whether there has been a differential impact?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
My question was about the third sector, not local authorities. I will come back to local authorities.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you—I appreciate that. I am content with that description and answer.
On the basis of taking that approach, what information can the Government set out in terms of the training or support that will be provided to the members of the chamber to which the issue has been allocated so that they understand some of the complexities? Although I appreciate what has been said about social security—this is council tax reduction; it is not a benefit—what specific support have members of the chamber been given so that they understand the complexities that some families may experience?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Good morning, minister, and good morning to your officials. Thank you for setting out the Government’s priorities and for sharing the information about the budget.
I want to raise a couple of issues. I take the point about the fairer Scotland budget statement being a huge improvement; we have heard that from witnesses. However, we also heard a witness say that navigating the budget document is still
“a bit of an art form.”——[Official Report, Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee, 24 January 2023; c 6.]
We heard language such as “vague statements” and “no substance”. We heard that it is hard to find the data in the annexes and that there is “insufficient clarity” on the impact of decisions. If people whose job it is to analyse the budget in terms of equalities are still struggling to navigate it, I worry about accessibility for the wider public.
Do you agree that the information is not quite there yet and that there is still quite a bit of work to do to enable organisations and individuals to follow the budget in a way that provides transparency and accountability?