The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1844 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
That is fine.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
That is a pity.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 June 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I can see that there will be such circumstances, but I just cannot work out what they might be or why a tribunal would be privy to a piece of information that an individual would not yet know. I get that it could cause the person harm but, in the circumstances of the particular tribunal, I am not sure that I can imagine a reason or rationale for withholding that information.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 June 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I have just one question. Are you in a position to set out what the rationale and grounds would be for withholding information from someone, and what the test would be for that?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 June 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Is there an example in international law that you could suggest to us?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Good morning to the panel. Thank you for the answers that you have given so far and for setting out in your opening statements some pretty clear bits of advice, including on the legal definitions of sex and gender reassignment. I found that particularly helpful, so I thank you for that. I thank you also for the written evidence that you submitted in advance of the meeting, which has been very useful.
I want to explore a bit more the impact of a gender recognition certificate and single-sex spaces. We have spent quite a bit of time talking about the effect of a gender recognition certificate in that regard. For example, Karon Monaghan described the effect of a GRC and what it means for the exclusion of trans people from single-sex spaces. You were quite clear about that, Karon.
As far as I can understand it, what appears to be the issue is the cohort of people who will be able to access a GRC, regardless of the effect of it, if that makes sense. There is a legal effect—it does not appear that that will change as a result of the bill, but more people will have access to that legal route. That is my understanding of what you said; if I have misunderstood it, please correct me.
Could you tell us a bit about who you think the cohort of people will be? We have heard some evidence that it is unlikely to be a group of new trans people, and that it is, in fact, likely to be an existing group of trans people who have not yet considered accessing a gender recognition certificate because of the troubles with accessing one.
My understanding, from the evidence that we have had already, is that those people who do not have a gender recognition certificate are currently accessing single-sex spaces—Women’s Aid and others have given evidence on how they operate those spaces—and that some of the people whom we are talking about do not have gender dysphoria but would still like legal recognition of their sex. Could you talk a bit about the cohort of people, who you think they are and how you think their rights to access single-sex spaces will be changed?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Recognising the fact that there will be people who seek to harm women, as there have been forever, do you think that those people will need a gender recognition certificate to do so?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I am sorry to interrupt but I am conscious of the time and keen to hear from Karon Monaghan. I have one other question. We have heard from people who are trans but who do not have gender dysphoria. What could we do to allow them to access a gender recognition certificate, which is incredibly important for them?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you.