The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2379 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 17 January 2024
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Those conversations across Government will be very interesting, particularly those on local government budgets.
Finally, given what we have just discussed, is the cabinet secretary concerned, as I am, that there is a reduction of about £7.7 million in the support for teachers budget this year?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 17 January 2024
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you. We will find agreement on much of what the cabinet secretary said about the importance of non-contact time in relation to behaviour in schools and terms and conditions for teachers. However, I heard nothing about what is in this year’s budget to deliver the change this year, so can I assume that the cabinet secretary does not expect the promised reduction in contact time to be delivered this year?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 17 January 2024
Pam Duncan-Glancy
With respect, cabinet secretary, that is not a statutory requirement that is funded by the Government, which is what the manifesto said would happen. That is the good will of some schools that are using PEF—which is already stretched to the limit—rather than the Government funding a pledge that it made in its manifesto.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 17 January 2024
Pam Duncan-Glancy
It was your commitment, cabinet secretary.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 17 January 2024
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Good morning, cabinet secretary—I do not think that I said that earlier. Thank you for your contributions so far.
You will be well aware of the importance that I place on non-contact time for teachers. How will the 2024-25 budget support the aim to reduce contact time for teachers?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 17 January 2024
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I have a final question, if I have your permission, convener.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 17 January 2024
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I appreciate that. I suspect that it might be about recruitment issues or geographical issues. I expect that you will get back a whole host of reasons, which will be interesting. However, where the money was given to local authorities and they did not maintain the numbers, are you also asking whether they deployed it to the education budget to address some of the other challenges that we have already discussed?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 17 January 2024
Pam Duncan-Glancy
The best-case analysis of the situation is that the reduction is only £28 million. That is a swingeing cut. The worst-case scenario is that it is nearer £50 million, so to claim that universities are getting the same as last year is just inaccurate.
09:45Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 17 January 2024
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I will take the theme of support for teachers a bit further and talk about empowerment and a bottom-up approach. I am sure that, during your engagement with teachers, you will have heard about their concern that decisions are outwith their control and are taken far away from them, rather than on the front line, but they are then expected to deliver on those decisions in difficult circumstances. How is the Government balancing top-down leadership with a more bottom-up approach to curriculum reform?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 17 January 2024
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you. I appreciate that answer.
As you will be aware, part of the concern is about having the time to engage with reform. This is paraphrasing, and I am sure that you will set me right if I am wrong, but you said that support for the reforms among the teaching profession could be waning—that might be the most polite way to say it—from the eager appetite for radical reform that maybe existed in 2021. Might that have something to do with the fact that teachers are facing immediate challenges in the classroom?