The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1844 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 8 December 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I appreciate that.
Frazer Scott, you said that you would vote for anything that improved the benefit system; I share that view. Do you think that this change will improve the benefit system?
09:30Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 8 December 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
That is fair. Thank you.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 8 December 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Good morning, Mark and Frazer, and thank you for your advance submissions and your answers to our questions so far.
Some of the questions that I had have already been answered, so, in the interests of time, I will not repeat them. I will start with a question for Mark, if that is okay.
SCOSS’s report says that breaking the link with cold weather is retrogressive in terms of human rights. Can you explain that a bit more? As far as I can tell, the Scottish Government’s answer to that seems to be that the unreliability of cold weather is difficult for low-income families and that a predictable one-off payment is better. How do you respond to that point, given the comments about human rights?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 6 December 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Do you have a sense of the reason for that increase?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 6 December 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Do you think that the inquiry will take your advice on that? Do you intend to give it advice to do that, or do you know how it will approach it?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 6 December 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
You made the point that there are two aspects to your work: protecting the legal floor for human rights and promoting human rights. In relation to protecting that floor, the committee—I am a member of two committees, but I am pretty sure that it was this one—heard from a group of learning disabled people, who spoke to us about their experience.
It was clear to me, given the number of people who are dying of preventable illnesses and the thousands of people who are stuck in hospital—in some cases, for years at a time—that the floor that we would expect for them is not being met. How can the committee ensure, through things such as the universal periodic review and the review of the 2018 report that Eilidh Dickson mentioned, that the floor is protected? What would you expect to see with regard to policy and budget that would allow us to tell whether we are protecting that minimum core?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 6 December 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Do you know when we can expect the UK Government’s responses?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 6 December 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
What is your view on the Scottish Government’s response to the recommendations?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 6 December 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Good morning, and thank you all for the information that you have provided so far.
During the pandemic, a number of things had to be paused, and you did some work on the Covid inquiry. In your view, do the terms of reference, which have been updated as a result of Lady Poole’s resignation, now take account of human rights? Do you expect that the inquiry will be framed by that, and can the committee or parliamentarians do anything to ensure that that is the case?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 6 December 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Do you have a view about what that would look like?