The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2383 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 29 May 2024
Pam Duncan-Glancy
How do you think that we should change the perception of computing science? How could we attract more teachers? Earlier, you spoke about a “demographic time bomb”, given the number of people who are leaving the profession. What would you do to change that? How would you attract more people to the profession?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 29 May 2024
Pam Duncan-Glancy
What would trying to do that involve?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 29 May 2024
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you.
That is all very helpful. What would you do at primary level, and what conversations have you had with the deans of education about that?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 29 May 2024
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you—I appreciate that.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 29 May 2024
Pam Duncan-Glancy
What about your own processes and the staff in your own office? Have you changed anything as a result of the experiences that you have heard throughout this process? What training are you giving your own staff? There will be questions later about wider public bodies.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 29 May 2024
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Good morning to the panel. Perhaps I can take the point about the right to express views—particularly with regard to article 12 of the UNCRC, on the right to be heard—a little bit further. First, how does the SPSO envisage the principles being used? Who would use them? Specifically with regard to article 12, how would you support children and young people in exercising their right to express their views?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 22 May 2024
Pam Duncan-Glancy
A report that you commissioned said that
“The needs of the Gaelic language must be considered more fully across all areas of public policy and all levers, current and future, should be utilised to better support the language”,
and the bòrd, the Association of Directors of Education in Scotland and His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Education all agree that this should not be siloed to education. Do you know why your predecessors decided to make the bill an education bill? What new things does the bill introduce outwith education that will help the communities that you just described?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 22 May 2024
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Can I interrupt you, Deputy First Minister? I appreciate what you are saying, but do you think that it is disappointing that the bill does not include housing, transport or other issues in its scope?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 22 May 2024
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you, convener, and there is no need to apologise.
I want to pick up on something that was said earlier by, I think, Claire Cullen on the scope of the bill and the fact that it has come to the education committee. I understand and accept that it is the norm for Parliament to determine which committee looks at which bill, but I would imagine that it is for the Government and the cabinet secretary at the time to determine the bill’s scope. When I asked the bill team about the scope of the bill earlier in our evidence-taking sessions, the answer that I got was that the bill’s scope is quite narrow. I will ask the question again: is it the Deputy First Minister’s view that the scope of this legislation could go beyond education to perhaps address some of the infrastructure challenges considered in the report that was referred to earlier?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 22 May 2024
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you. Some of the evidence that we have had has supported what you just said, but it has also been suggested that the bill represents incremental and quite slow progress. Professor McLeod said that it is important for us to think about “outcomes, not outputs”. What outcomes could not have been achieved administratively and through existing powers?