The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1844 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 23 February 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
How would there be a two-tier system just now? My understanding is that all carers allowance is being paid by the UK Government. The two-tier system would be one tier in Scotland and one tier in the rest of the UK, which I think we can all accept is the point of devolution. I do not understand that justification.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 23 February 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you.
As the minister and other members will be aware, the Scottish statutory instrument that we are looking at today raises the carers allowance earnings limit to £139, which in the context of some of the figures that I set out earlier is very helpful. However, in the Government’s consultation on carers assistance, the proposed increased to the amount that carers could earn while receiving that assistance—of course, carers allowance is still being delivered through the DWP under an agency agreement—could be linked to 16 hours at the real living wage, which would be £174. Has the minister considered that figure as opposed to £139? Why has the minister not taken the opportunity to put more money into the pockets of unpaid carers, who are really struggling right now?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 23 February 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I appreciate that there is a live consultation, but does the minister accept that unpaid carers are struggling and that any increase could be helpful? The figure that I have chosen is the one that the minister proposed in the consultation. I am not asking the minister to pre-empt the conclusions, but I think that it is fair to assume that unpaid carers would accept that more money is needed. I am just asking whether that figure was considered.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Good morning. Thank you for joining us and for bringing Fernando with you. It is always nice to see a pet, stuffed or otherwise, online.
I am keen to pick up on cultural awareness, where my colleague Rachael Hamilton left off. When we last spoke, there was an aspiration for us to do something on particular weeks. Can we help with that on an on-going basis? What would you like or do you need politicians in this room and across the chamber to do to support that work?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you. Obviously, there has been a lot of focus this week on Ukraine and the illegal war there. We heard briefly about that just now. I take the point about your engagement with those families, but do you know whether access to training in English as a second language here has been stretched? Are there enough resources to make sure that people who come here from Ukraine and other countries get access to that education?
09:45Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
In the motion that you read out earlier, you said that “further steps are needed”. Will you set out some of those further steps for us?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I suspect that Rachael and I may be about to ask the same thing—I hope that I do not cut across you, Rachael.
On that final point, what options are available to us to uphold the minimum core? What have we got now and what will we need in the future so that, if we see a circumstance—Rob Watts highlighted a good example—where we may not meet the basic minimum, we can enforce it? What powers do you, the courts, individuals and parliamentarians need?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
That is a good question. I mean both: now—I am conscious that, as we have heard, we should be enforcing the minimum core now—and post-incorporation as well. The purpose of incorporation is to make rights more real for people, surely.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you—I appreciate that. That is an interesting way to put it: what do we do first? We will need to have a wee think about that and probably come back to you guys for your expertise on it.
I want to pick up on your point, Luis, about measurement and data. Is the availability of data and the gathering of evidence and data, as well as your ability to compel that data to be provided, an issue? Are both things an issue, or is it just—
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Both. Okay. That links into my next question. How can we measure whether we are meeting those obligations? Also, how can we measure whether the state has used all its resources? How can we measure whether we have maximised the resources in terms of the relative provision? Where do we start?