The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2169 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Does that need to be in the bill or in regulations?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you.
Jo Derrick, in your response, you call for considerable additional funding for advocacy services, to ensure that they are effective. Can you tell us a bit about the capacity in the current system and as you think it needs to be?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I appreciate that. Thank you.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Duncan Dunlop, your evidence is really compelling, as is the way that you have just articulated it. There are a couple of measures that you have said would bring about real transformation. One is to guarantee every care leaver a job in the public sector. Does what you have outlined need to be in the bill or are there other ways to do some of those things?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Do you have suggestions on the specifics? Who should we engage with and how should we engage? The committee’s job is to look at the bill, to consider the evidence that we have heard and, potentially, to recommend amendments, should the bill pass stage 1.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you—I appreciate that answer. I will move on to advocacy. Several organisations have commented on the extent to which the new right to access advocacy services for care-experienced people in section 4 of the bill would be shaped in secondary legislation. The committee also heard that there could be confusion between that provision and section 18 on advocacy in the hearings system. Respondents, including the Fostering Network, called for a definition of independent advocacy. Natalie Williams, can you talk about your understanding of advocacy, and what needs to be in the bill and what can be left to regulation?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Do you have a view on whether that should be opt in or opt out?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you.
Lynne O’Brien, you said in your evidence that many professionals who are already involved in young people’s lives will consider themselves to be advocating for the young person. Do you see a distinction between some of those professionals and an independent advocate?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I appreciate that. I will move on to ask some detailed questions about advocacy. Laura Pasternak, I will start with you and then go to Margaret Smith.
The advocacy provisions in the bill, which are mainly in section 4, is shaped by a lot of secondary legislation. Some of the responses that we have had highlight the potential for confusion with section 18, which relates to information on advocacy in the hearings system. Is there anything that you think absolutely needs to be in the bill? Margaret Smith talked about a definition of independent advocacy. Should anything else on advocacy be in the bill? How does it relate to information on advocacy in the hearings system?