The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2015 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I appreciate that, but the reality is that, this year, 35,400 young people between the ages of 16 and 24 are not in employment, which is an increase. There has also been a reduction in the number of people going to college. We know that the number of positive destinations has gone down, despite the figures that the cabinet secretary has cited. On this Government’s watch, opportunities for young people are declining. Can the cabinet secretary explain why that might be? What can she do to address the situation?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
In that case, you will know that the level has gone down.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you, cabinet secretary. With the convener’s forbearance, I have a couple of questions to put to the Minister for Higher and Further Education. In her letter to the committee, the cabinet secretary said that there would be no reduction in funding for colleges this year as a result of the change in the funding model.
However, Glasgow Kelvin College, in my region, has had a net reduction in funding, and it has been left wondering why it has been grouped with the family of colleges that it has been grouped with. Can the minister shed any light on the reasons for the decisions that have been taken and the impact that they have had on colleges such as Glasgow Kelvin College? The fact that they serve a number of areas that have a high level of deprivation does not seem to have been taken account of in the allocation.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
The minister is right about that data. The £170,000 is a 0.82 per cent net increase, which, as the college put it to me, when you take into consideration its other, wider obligations, is a real-terms cut. Does the allocation take account of the fact that the college serves areas of multiple deprivation and a large proportion of learners with ASN?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I think that I can help. In response to a freedom of information request, the Government has detailed how many ASN teachers and ASN pupils there are. That equates to a ratio of approximately one ASN teacher to 208 pupils with additional support needs. Parents, children and young people and teachers and staff in schools will probably recognise that ratio, because they know how stretched things are. What will the cabinet secretary do to make a difference for pupils with additional support needs?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I will ask my substantive questions in a moment, but I have a supplementary question on the clawback. Professor Miller and Professor Rigby, you have both spoken of concerns about articulation, in particular, and the flexibility in the system. Has the SFC indicated to either of you or to the Government that there is an understanding of the pressures on all parts of the tertiary system and the flexibility that is required for it to deliver what Scotland needs to address some of the problems that you have highlighted?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you. That is helpful.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I appreciate that, Professor Mathieson, and people are not looking for it to be sugar-coated. I believe that they genuinely want to see what the situation is, without the sugar-coating, but they also want you to hear what they have to say without their sugar-coating it. Having that open dialogue, on the back of some of the discussions today, could go a long way to trying to come to the joint solution that your students, your staff, your leadership and you want to see, which would mean that the University of Edinburgh could continue to do the great work that it is doing for the region and for Scotland.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Have you done any impact assessment of the decision?