The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1174 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 27 September 2022
Paul Sweeney
That is reassuring. Perhaps committee members can reflect on the matter as we proceed with the bill.
More broadly, we are interested in understanding more about what the commission did to seek the views of consumer groups. What feedback or evidence did you receive in the course of preparing the draft legislation?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 27 September 2022
Paul Sweeney
I mentioned sections 63, 65 and 66.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 27 September 2022
Paul Sweeney
I have no further questions. That was a helpful series of responses, so I am happy to rest on that.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 27 September 2022
Paul Sweeney
I thank the commissioners for their helpful evidence and statements so far. I will touch on some of the aspects around consumer protections, in addition to the issues mentioned by Mr Mundell, with regard to how we can create a mechanism that is effective at protecting consumers.
There has been some focus on the £1,000 placeholder, which, with hindsight, has perhaps been a bit of an unfortunate red herring. In private session, the committee has considered lodging an amendment to provide automatic controls on that figure—some sort of deflator that would automatically correct every financial year. Would you endorse such a mechanism? Would that be a reasonable undertaking, and would you, perhaps, assist us in designing it?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 27 September 2022
Paul Sweeney
That is helpful background and provides some degree of reassurance on the commentary that we have heard on the proposed legislation.
Responses from law centres were mentioned. We have received a response from Govan Law Centre, which, in effect, compared the enforcement of statutory pledges to warrant sales. I assume that you do not think that that is a fair characterisation.
Particular sections of the bill have been highlighted in that regard. Section 63 entitles a creditor to serve a pledge enforcement notice on a debtor if payment has not been made. Section 65 enables an authorised person—in other words, a sheriff officer—to enter someone’s home to remove moveable goods, subject to the statutory pledge. Section 66 gives a creditor the right to sell someone’s moveable goods at a public auction.
Bearing in mind the fact that we have discussed the protections that we can introduce in relation to particular goods, household vulnerability and exposure, will you explain why the characterisation of the enforcement of statutory pledges as warrant sales is not fair? That will allow us to understand the context better.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 29 June 2022
Paul Sweeney
When I read the papers for today’s meeting, I noticed that the Scottish Law Commission’s current work programme includes two projects—one on homicide and one on aspects of family law. Both come close to the topic of the petition, but neither covers the actual issue that has been raised. Another avenue to explore could involve a meeting with the Scottish Law Commission. The committee might be able to facilitate such a meeting to discuss those projects and the potential interface with the particular issue and the deficiencies that you have highlighted today.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 29 June 2022
Paul Sweeney
It would perhaps be worth writing to the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities and to the 32 local authority education services to ascertain what provision they make within schools. That could help to establish a pattern of activity.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 29 June 2022
Paul Sweeney
Does that provide a good framework through which the law in Scotland could be brought up to the same level?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 29 June 2022
Paul Sweeney
That is certainly worth considering.
I also want to offer a couple of ideas. The issue is a very good candidate for a member’s bill—I am sure that the committee has noted that. It might be worth discussing that with the committee, and with your constituency and regional MSPs, who might be interested in the idea of sponsoring such a bill. MSPs have certainly been working in that field and it might be of interest to them. That is another potential mechanism by which to achieve the remedy.
I will rest on that, for now, convener.
09:45Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 29 June 2022
Paul Sweeney
Certainly, when we look at alternative technologies that are available in other jurisdictions—particularly in London, where there is an automatic fare-capping system that was introduced five or six years ago—we see that there are solutions that could offer a remedy, particularly on intra-Scotland travel as opposed to travel to other parts of the UK. Perhaps it is worth inviting submissions from the likes of Transport for London about its fare-capping technology and how it has been rolled out. That could offer a basis for how a system could be delivered in Scotland.